Yes.

David

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <k...@google.com> wrote:
>> One thing I overlooked before.
>> In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
>> -f[no-]address-sanitizer
>> (it used to be -fasan in early patches, but was renamed before submitting to
>> trunk).
>> Do we want to be flag-compatible with clang (I'd say yes)?
>
> I agree.
>
>
> Diego.

Reply via email to