On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <k...@google.com> wrote: > One thing I overlooked before. > In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses > -f[no-]address-sanitizer > (it used to be -fasan in early patches, but was renamed before submitting to > trunk). > Do we want to be flag-compatible with clang (I'd say yes)?
I agree. Diego.
