Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-07 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 03:11, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-07 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-04 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-03 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 20

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-03 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > >>> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20,

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-01 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > >>> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-10-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Pr

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-30 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-30 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/30/19 12:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Jeff Law wrote: > On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> > >>> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > For PR91532, the dead store i

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >>> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: Hi, For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass between

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > Hi, > > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > > > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-25 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > Hi, > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there > > ? > > Or should we add an ad-hoc

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-25 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 10:30, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > > Hi, > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there > > ? > > Or should we add an

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ? > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that > will clean up the dea

Re: [SVE] PR91532

2019-09-19 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ? > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that > will clean up the de