On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ? > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that > will clean up the dead store ? I'd hesitate to add another DSE pass. If there's one nearby could we move the existing pass?
Jeff
