On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ? > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that > will clean up the dead store ?
No, the issue is the same as PR33315 and exists on the non-vectorized code as well. Richard.
