Hi, this was checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-01/msg00442.html
Thanks, K
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> Kirill,
>
> Could you commit patch?
>
> 2013-01-11 Vladimir Yakovlev
>
> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
>
Kirill,
Could you commit patch?
2013-01-11 Vladimir Yakovlev
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL): New macro.
(m_CORE_ALL):
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> I sent the patch. Send it once more.
>
> 2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>>> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>>>
>>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
I sent the patch. Send it once more.
2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>>
>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
>>
>> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal):
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>
> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
>
> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
> (ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
>
>
I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL): New ma
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:28:24PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>
> > It seems I didn't sent a patch with last changes. Sorry if so.
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev at the end of line.
> >
> > * config
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
wrote:
> It seems I didn't sent a patch with last changes. Sorry if so.
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
> (ix86_target_macros_internal): Likew
Hello Uros,
It seems I didn't sent a patch with last changes. Sorry if so.
Vladimir
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>> I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
>>
>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev >
>> * config/i386/i386-c.c (i
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
>
> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
> (ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
>
> * config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE
I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>> I did changes. Please take a look.
>>
>> 2012/12/29, Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
>>> wrote:
>>>
processor_alias_tab
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> I did changes. Please take a look.
>
> 2012/12/29, Uros Bizjak :
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
>>> "corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> I did canges. Please take a look.
Please attach the patch, relative to mainline, not an incremental
patch vs. your previous version.
Thanks,
Uros.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
> "corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-i" and "core-avx2". At least, it has
> consequence on checking x86_avx256_split_unaligned_load &
> ix86_tune_mask: for all these processor
Hello,
processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
"corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-i" and "core-avx2". At least, it has
consequence on checking x86_avx256_split_unaligned_load &
ix86_tune_mask: for all these processors it results the same. Moreover
we cannot turn new features
Hello!
> New processors core-avx and core-avx2 are added. It was done to have
> possibilities to turn new features on for these processors. Please review.
I don't think this is a good approach, you are mixing an architecture
with an ISA extension in the name. We already have
processor_alias_table
16 matches
Mail list logo