Kirill, Could you commit patch?
2013-01-11 Vladimir Yakovlev <vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL): New macro.
(m_CORE_ALL): Likewise.
(initial_ix86_tune_features): m_CORE2I7 is replaced by m_CORE_ALL.
(initial_ix86_arch_features): Likewise.
(processor_target_table): Initializations for Core avx2.
(cpu_names): New names "core-avx2".
(ix86_option_override_internal): Changed PROCESSOR_COREI7 by
PROCESSOR_CORE_HASWELL.
(ix86_issue_rate): New case.
(ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead): Likewise.
(ix86_sched_init_global): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_HASWELL): New macro.
(target_cpu_default): New TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT_haswell.
(processor_type): New PROCESSOR_HASWELL.
2013/1/11 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev <vbyakov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I sent the patch. Send it once more.
>>
>> 2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>>>> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>>>>
>>>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev <vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
>>>> (ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
>>>>
>>>> * config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
>>>> (m_CORE_HASWELL): New macro.
>>>> (m_CORE_ALL): Likewise.
>>>> (initial_ix86_tune_features): m_CORE2I7 is replaced by m_CORE_ALL.
>>>> (initial_ix86_arch_features): Likewise.
>>>> (processor_target_table): Initializations for Core avx2.
>>>> (cpu_names): New names "core-avx2".
>>>> (ix86_option_override_internal): Changed PROCESSOR_COREI7 by
>>>> PROCESSOR_CORE_HASWELL.
>>>> (ix86_issue_rate): New case.
>>>> (ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead): Likewise.
>>>> (ix86_sched_init_global): Likewise.
>>>>
>>>> * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_HASWELL): New macro.
>>>> (target_cpu_default): New TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT_haswell.
>>>> (processor_type): New PROCESSOR_HASWELL.
>>>
>>> Uros already acked the patch, so it certainly is ok to commit now.
>
> Yes, the patch is OK, you can commit it to mainline SVN. If you are
> unable to commit, please say so in the patch proposal, so someone will
> commit the patch for you (as explained in [1]).
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
>
> Uros.
patch1
Description: Binary data
