On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev <vbyakov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all > "corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-i" and "core-avx2". At least, it has > consequence on checking x86_avx256_split_unaligned_load & > ix86_tune_mask: for all these processors it results the same. Moreover > we cannot turn new features on for AVX/AVX2 using > initial_ix86_tune_features. corei7, corei7-avx and core-avx-i are all based on sandybridge (= PROCESSOR_COREI7) architecture. The only problematic entry is core-avx2, which should be based on new architecture. I propose PROCESSOR_HASWELL, in the same way as we have PROCESSOR_NOCONA. Uros.
