On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we support -O2 -march=lakemont with
>>>
>>> __attribute__((
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Do we support -O2 -march=lakemont with
>>
>> __attribute__((target("arch=silvermont")))
>
> Hm, no.
>
>>>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> Do we support -O2 -march=lakemont with
>
> __attribute__((target("arch=silvermont")))
Hm, no.
>>>
>>> Do we issue an error or silently ignore
>>> __attribute__(
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Do we support -O2 -march=lakemont with
__attribute__((target("arch=silvermont")))
>>>
>>> Hm, no.
>>>
>>
>> Do we issue an error or silently ignore
>> __attribute__((target("arch=silvermont")))?
>> If we don't support it, should w
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Yulia Koval wrote:
> Hi,
>
> T
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Yulia Koval wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes the issue:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Yulia Koval wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the issue:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>>>
>>> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Yulia Koval wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>>
>> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal) Disable
>> 80387 mask if lake
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Yulia Koval wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes the issue:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>
> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal) Disable
> 80387 mask if lakemont target is set.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:17 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:15 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Yulia Koval wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the issue:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>>>
>>> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_optio
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:15 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Yulia Koval wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>>
>> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal) Disable
>> 80387 mask if lakemont
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Yulia Koval wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes the issue:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
>
> gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal) Disable
> 80387 mask if lakemont target is set.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/
13 matches
Mail list logo
