kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen,
Ken ; Liu, Hongtao ; Robin Dapp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Refine the avg_ceil with fixed point vaadd
> Looks like the CI cannot tell patch series? There are 3 patches and the CI
> will run for each one.
> Of course, the first one
Looks like the CI cannot tell patch series? There are 3 patches and the CI
will run for each one.
Of course, the first one will have scan failure due to expanding change, but
the second one reconciles them.
Finally the third one will have all test passed as below, I think it
indicates all test
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 9:11 PM
To: Robin Dapp ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen,
Ken ; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 0/3] Refine the avg_ceil with fixed point vaadd
> The CI s
From: Robin Dapp
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 3:42 PM
To: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com;
rdapp@gmail.com; Chen, Ken ; Liu, Hongtao
; Robin Dapp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Refine the avg_ceil with fixed point vaadd
Similar to the avg_floor, the avg_ceil has the rounding mode
towards +inf, while the vaadd.vv has the rnu which totally match
the sematics. From RVV spec, the fixed vaadd.vv with rnu,
The CI shows some scan failures in vls/avg-[456].c and widen/vec-avg-rv32gcv.c.
Also, the lint check complains
From: Pan Li
Similar to the avg_floor, the avg_ceil has the rounding mode
towards +inf, while the vaadd.vv has the rnu which totally match
the sematics. From RVV spec, the fixed vaadd.vv with rnu,
roundoff_signed(v, d) = (signed(v) >> d) + r
r = v[d - 1]
For vaadd, d = 1, then we have
roundof
