> Yes, you're right.  I have looked at it again an hour ago and came to the 
> same 
> conclusion.  I thought this worked before and it would only show results for
> the last patch of the series?

> Anyway, the series is OK.

Thanks Robin, will commit it with the format issue fixed after test is OK.

I am not very sure it worked before but looks the avg_floor series has the
same test results as avg_ceil.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 9:48 PM
To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com>; 
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, 
Ken <ken.c...@intel.com>; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com>; Robin Dapp 
<rdapp....@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Refine the avg_ceil with fixed point vaadd

> Looks like the CI cannot tell patch series? There are 3 patches and the CI 
> will run for each one.
> Of course, the first one will have scan failure due to expanding change, but 
> the second one reconciles them.
>
> Finally the third one will have all test passed as below, I think it 
> indicates all tests are good IMO. Feel free to correct me if any 
> misunderstandings.
>
> rivoscibot/toolchain-ci-rivos-test    success Testing passed
>
> It looks like the CI can test once after all patches of series? 

Yes, you're right.  I have looked at it again an hour ago and came to the same 
conclusion.  I thought this worked before and it would only show results for
the last patch of the series?

Anyway, the series is OK.

-- 
Regards
 Robin

Reply via email to