> Yes, you're right. I have looked at it again an hour ago and came to the > same > conclusion. I thought this worked before and it would only show results for > the last patch of the series?
> Anyway, the series is OK. Thanks Robin, will commit it with the format issue fixed after test is OK. I am not very sure it worked before but looks the avg_floor series has the same test results as avg_ceil. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 9:48 PM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, Ken <ken.c...@intel.com>; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com>; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Refine the avg_ceil with fixed point vaadd > Looks like the CI cannot tell patch series? There are 3 patches and the CI > will run for each one. > Of course, the first one will have scan failure due to expanding change, but > the second one reconciles them. > > Finally the third one will have all test passed as below, I think it > indicates all tests are good IMO. Feel free to correct me if any > misunderstandings. > > rivoscibot/toolchain-ci-rivos-test success Testing passed > > It looks like the CI can test once after all patches of series? Yes, you're right. I have looked at it again an hour ago and came to the same conclusion. I thought this worked before and it would only show results for the last patch of the series? Anyway, the series is OK. -- Regards Robin
