Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-04-09 Thread Robin Dapp
I see, reverted. Thanks Robin for reminder. Thanks! BTW and just for open discussion, is this really a good way for such kind of tests? Though most of the tests are similar like this but it may hide possible unexpected results up to a point. Yeah we have several flaky tests and in those cas

RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-04-09 Thread Li, Pan2
: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 6:47 PM To: Li, Pan2 ; Robin Dapp ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, Ken ; Robin Dapp Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3 Hi Pan, Richard committed combine

Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-04-09 Thread Robin Dapp
Hi Pan, Richard committed combine patches that restored most of the previous behavior so we shouldn't need the refinement any more. AFAICT the tests should now pass in their previous state but definitely fail in their current state. Do you want to revert this change? Thanks. -- Regards Robi

RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-03-15 Thread Li, Pan2
eems no other failures from rvv.exp now. Pan -Original Message- From: Robin Dapp Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 5:48 PM To: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, Ken ; Robin Dapp Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V

Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-03-13 Thread Robin Dapp
I'm not opposed to refactoring but what's the reason for it? We have a large number of similar tests that also include all possible types. And aren't all the tests you touch FAILing anyway right now? (Due to the combine change...) Yes, the cond_widen_complicate-3 need some tweak for the asm

[PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-03-12 Thread pan2 . li
From: Pan Li Rearrange the test cases of cond_widen_complicate-3 by different types into different files, instead of put all types together. Then we can easily reduce the range when asm check fails. The below test suites are passed locally, let's wait online CI says. * The rv64gcv fully regress

Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-03-12 Thread Robin Dapp
From: Pan Li Rearrange the test cases of cond_widen_complicate-3 by different types into different files, instead of put all types together. Then we can easily reduce the range when asm check fails. I'm not opposed to refactoring but what's the reason for it? We have a large number of simil

RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcases for cond_widen_complicate-3

2025-03-12 Thread Li, Pan2
o meet current behavior. Pan -Original Message- From: Robin Dapp Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 7:11 PM To: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, Ken ; Robin Dapp Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refine the testcase