I see, reverted. Thanks Robin for reminder.
Thanks!
BTW and just for open discussion, is this really a good way for such kind of tests? Though most of the tests are similar like this but it may hide possible unexpected results up to a point.
Yeah we have several flaky tests and in those cases we should try to change the test criteria. This one here, though, I wouldn't count to them as it expects a certain number of widening ops. Due to the combine changes (lack of 2->2 combinations I think) we couldn't achieve the result we expected and the code was indeed slightly worse.
-- Regards Robin
