> Is it Ok for trunk ? Or you want me send a separate patch to remove "@" in
> > vec_extract optab ?
> >
> >
> >
> > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> >
> > From: Kito Cheng
> > Date: 2023-09-14 16:11
> > To: Juzhe-Zhong
> > CC: gcc-patches; kit
dded with rv64gcv_zve32x ?
>
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-09-14 17:20
> To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> CC: gcc-patches; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; Robin Dapp
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar mode
> move[PR111391]
?
>
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-09-14 16:11
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar mode move[PR111391]
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:04 P
You mean try pr111391.c
that I added with rv64gcv_zve32x ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-09-14 17:20
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; Robin Dapp
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar mode
move[PR111391]
Could you
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-09-14 16:11
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar mode move[PR111391]
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:04 PM Juzhe-Zhong
Is it Ok for trunk ? Or you want me send a separate patch to remove "@" in
vec_extract optab ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-09-14 16:11
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to scalar
create_integer_operand (&ops[2], index);
+ expand_insn (icode, 3, ops);
This code is copied from optabs-query.cc
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-09-14 16:11
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] RISC-V: Expand VLS mode to
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:04 PM Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
> This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111391
>
> I notice that previous patch (V2 patch) cause additional execution fail of
> pr69719.c
> This FAIL is because of the latent BUG of VSETVL PASS.
>
> So this patch include
This patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111391
I notice that previous patch (V2 patch) cause additional execution fail of
pr69719.c
This FAIL is because of the latent BUG of VSETVL PASS.
So this patch includes VSETVL PASS fix even though it's not related to the
PR111391.
