Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-06-30 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/30/2017 04:31 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 04/10/2017 05:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 04/07/2017 04:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote:

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-06-30 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/10/2017 05:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 04/07/2017 04:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >>> >>> On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > > I would like to ping that. I'm not sure

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-04-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 04/07/2017 04:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> >> On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >>> On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-04-10 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/07/2017 04:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing hi

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-04-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read >> discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html >> >> Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. > Not sure if you're pinging the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-04-06 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. Not sure if you're pinging the internal_error_cont stuff, or the ODR diagnostics c

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-03-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/24/2017 09:37 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. I haven't seen any followup posts af

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-03-24 Thread Martin Sebor
On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote: I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. I haven't seen any followup posts after the one above. The other (and I think mo

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-03-24 Thread Martin Liška
I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him. Thanks, Martin

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-03-15 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:53 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Hello. > > Following small series exclude some strings from pot files via > introduction of internal_error_cont function. > > Patch can bootstrap and survives regression tests. > > (Sorry for broken threading because my cover letter was re

[PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files

2017-03-15 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. Following small series exclude some strings from pot files via introduction of internal_error_cont function. Patch can bootstrap and survives regression tests. (Sorry for broken threading because my cover letter was rejected). Martin marxin (3): Introduce internal_error_cont function