On 02/21/2012 04:27 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:23:16PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> using the -fgnu-tm option fails for targets not supporting libitm with
>> a *link* failure. So the compile test wasn't sufficient.
>>
>> With the attached patch the following failures
"Andreas Krebbel" writes:
> Ok for mainline?
No, this is wrong. How would gcc be able to find the uninstalled libitm.so
and libitm.spec on targets that do support it?
I'm undecided how (and where) best to fix this. One might either handle
it via something like dg-add-options tm_runtime, or co
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:23:16PM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> using the -fgnu-tm option fails for targets not supporting libitm with
> a *link* failure. So the compile test wasn't sufficient.
>
> With the attached patch the following failures disappear on s390 and
> s390x:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/
Hi,
using the -fgnu-tm option fails for targets not supporting libitm with
a *link* failure. So the compile test wasn't sufficient.
With the attached patch the following failures disappear on s390 and
s390x:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link,
-flto -
