https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri May 5 15:41:28 2017
New Revision: 247640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR71607: Fix ICE when loading constant
2017-05-05 Andre V
8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77709
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80643
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77709
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm*-*-*
Hi,
When compiling the below testcase with "-S -march=armv7-a -fcall-saved-s14
-mfpu=vfpv4 -mfloat-abi=hard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78318
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Jun 19 15:01:11 2017
New Revision: 249372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71607: Fix ICE when loading constant
2017-06-19 Prakhar Bahug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Jun 20 11:19:36 2017
New Revision: 249406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249406&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR69866
2017-06-20 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Jun 21 08:17:56 2017
New Revision: 249437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-21 Thomas Preud'homme
Revert:
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81174
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Simplified testcase:
> static inline unsigned
> bar (unsigned x)
> {
> return ((x & 0x00ff) << 24) | ((x & 0xff00) << 8)
>| ((x & 0x00ff000
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
These testcases (gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c) also
started to fail for ARM Cortex-M0, Cortex-M3 and Cortex-M4 arm-none-eabi
targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #6)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #5)
> > Got a patch, testing it now.
>
> Bootstrapped and testsuite came back clean. Trying to turn the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri Nov 25 10:03:38 2016
New Revision: 242869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object
2016-11-25 Thomas
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Created attachment 40208
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40208&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
I've tracked down the problem to do_remat:
The function scans instruction forward in each basic block and looks for a
candidate to use for rematerialization. To check whether the candidate is used,
it v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 7 17:56:53 2016
New Revision: 243374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-07 Thomas Preud'homme
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 7 18:15:52 2016
New Revision: 243375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243375&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-07 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri Dec 9 15:26:17 2016
New Revision: 243490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Dec 12 10:58:17 2016
New Revision: 243543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77904: callee-saved register trashed when clobbering sp
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:39:02 2016
New Revision: 243600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243600&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77933: stack corruption on ARM when using high registers and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 14 09:58:23 2016
New Revision: 243635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object
2016-12-14 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:07:01 2016
New Revision: 243637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object
2016-12-14 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
FYI: -mtune=cortex-a15 works for an arm-none-eabi toolchain targetting
Cortex-M7
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40517
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40517&acti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Jan 17 10:09:47 2017
New Revision: 244525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Jan 17 10:11:20 2017
New Revision: 244526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.1, 6.3.1
Known to fail|5.4
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Created attachment 40533
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2)
> I don't think that's correct: I've noticed a new error message between
> r244739 and r244756, and you committed this in-between (r244746).
>
> The error a
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Also fail for arm-none-eabi targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79273
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> I can't reproduce these failures with an hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
> cross-compiler and I don't see them in the most recent test results for the
> target (https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |thopre01 at gcc dot
gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Patch has been submitted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00110.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Sadly I could not come up with a minimal testcase so far. What I can see from
the code is that tree code hoisting increases the live range of some values
which then translates into more spilling in reloa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Mar 22 11:35:15 2017
New Revision: 246365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR80082: LDRD erronously used for 64bit load on ARMv7-R
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #9)
> Sadly I could not come up with a minimal testcase so far. What I can see
> from the code is that tree code hoisting increases the live range of some
>
-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Can you benchmark the 2nd candidate (most appropriate at this stage I think,
> would also fix 77498).
>
> It will cause pessimizations for code that benefi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6 and #7)
>
> The testcase shows hardly profitable PRE which the patches should
> disable (I didn't verify the patches fix the testcase!)
The patch does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Ah, the patches do not fix the testcase because the testcase is _not_ the
> PRE-creates-IV case. It's indeed simply hoisting/PRE at work transforming
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #14)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > Funnily this led back to the Cortex-M0+ reduced testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #17)
> > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> > > On Thu, 23 M
-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
Performance for dhrystone has regressed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|rtl-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
> is the diff you show backwards? Otherwise the new code looks distinctly
> better.
Yes it is, sorry. Diff good bad is:
- add r5, sp, #16
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #1)
>
> I believe the problem is that the equivalence stays with NO_REGS as register
> class instead of being given that of a register (since it's going to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80239
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
The following test have regressed between GCC 6 and GCC7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80307
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80307
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Apr 4 16:24:18 2017
New Revision: 246682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix small multiply feature
2017-04-03 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80307
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Apr 6 14:53:22 2017
New Revision: 246733
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246733&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Compile atomic_loaddi_11 for Cortex-R5
2017-04-06 Thomas P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Apr 6 16:26:39 2017
New Revision: 246734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-06 Thomas Preud'homme
gcc/
PR target/80082
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
r235184 introduced the ability to reload expressions with equiv but reload
happens
mas Preud'homme from comment #17)
> > > > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Funnily this led back to the Cortex-M0+ red
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #21)
>
> I can see this behavior for Cortex-M0+ indeed but the results are different
> for Cortex-M7 for me:
>
>
> % arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -S ~/corte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #23)
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #25)
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #28 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #27)
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Apr 11 15:26:20 2017
New Revision: 246844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR80082: LDRD erronously used for 64bit load on ARMv7-R
2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #31)
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> > prathamesh3492 at gcc d
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42537&action=edit
Testcase showing
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42538
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42538&action=edit
unparsable RTL
Hi,
when pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82817
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The GIMPLE FE also doesn't like that some variable names created by the
> middle-end contain '.'.
>
> I belive it would be good to "fix" create_tmp_var_nam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82817
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82817
> >
> &g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82817
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #4)
> > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Nov 28 15:19:14 2017
New Revision: 255203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1
2017-11-28 Thomas Preud'ho
rmal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
The following tests regressed on arm-none-eabi targets a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Are we sure this is not gdbs fault?
GDB version was fixed when I did my bisect. That said, I don't know what sort
of change happened in DWARF so it may wel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83199
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Created attachment 42742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42742&action=edit
Executable async and skip produced by GCC trunk
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
The following tests started to fail on arm-none-eabi targets after commit
r253809:
PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/graph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Can't reproduce
>
> What ISL version are you using?
ISL 0.15.
Also my apologies but I haven't tried on Arm Cortex-M7 yet actually, typed it
in as a forc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On November 29, 2017 4:35:12 PM GMT+01:00, "thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10)
> The test was changed to link-only (to exercise LTO) in r244385.
I think you meant r244537
(https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr787
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Christophe Monat from comment #4)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3)
>
> Thomas,
Hi Christophe,
>
> I am seeing that the assignee name has been reset : does it mean that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.2.1
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Pr
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
gcc.dg/tree-ssa
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c fails
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: bergner at vnet dot ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: arm-none-eabi
Hi,
GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77714
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Hi Bernd & Peter,
Yes the code is still failing on today's trunk. I tested both patch you propose
Bernd and both seems to work. Thanks a lot for such a quick fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> I think this failure may have been inadvertently introduced in r240434. The
> failure should be gone now that r240442 has been checked in to adjust the
> tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Test now builds but execution shows a few FAIL:
FAIL: test_d_i:266: "%hhi" expected result for "-16657" doesn't match function
call return value: 6 not in [1, 4]
FAIL: test_d_i:267: "%hhu" expected resu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> With GCC 7.0.0 20160927 configured with --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --target=arm-none-eabi I get the expected output
> (below).
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||7.0
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
I can reproduce the behavior mentioned on trunk.
101 - 200 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
