https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Christophe Monat from comment #4)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3)
> 
> Thomas,

Hi Christophe,

> 
> I am seeing that the assignee name has been reset : does it mean that you
> definitely disengage from looking at this problem ?

Yes but only because a colleague took over. He is trying a new approach for
-mslow-flash-data altogether which should prove cleaner.

> 
> If this is the case, and if nobody officially takes over, would you share
> your current patch ?

I'd prefer not since my colleague Andre took over and is actively working on
it. He'll keep this bug updated of any progress.

Best regards,

Thomas

Reply via email to