https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme <thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I think this failure may have been inadvertently introduced in r240434. The > failure should be gone now that r240442 has been checked in to adjust the > test. Hi Martin, Sadly no, I've checked revision 240484 (last commit I could grab) and the failure is still there. Best regards.
