[Bug target/99216] ICE in aarch64_sve::function_expander::expand() with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99216 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #4) > Right, the problem appears to be to do with the way that overloaded > functions are implemented for the ACLE. Specifically the m_direct_overloads > f

[Bug target/99596] [11 Regression] arm: internal error in single_pred_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99596 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/98726] [10/11 Regression] SVE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98726 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think we should do a variation on (3): use poly-int subtraction in rtx_vector_builder::step but force the returned value to a constant using to_constant (). The justification is that the enc

[Bug target/99581] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during RTL pass: final - void QTWTF::TCMalloc_PageHeap::scavengerThread() since r11-7526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for not responding until now, but would it work to make the "o" constraint check memory_address_addr_space_p too, like the other memory constraints do? IMO it's wrong for "o" to accept

[Bug target/99540] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/99766] [11 Regression] ICE: unable to generate reloads with SVE code since r11-7807-gbe70bb5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/96582] aarch64:ICE during GIMPLE pass: veclower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96582 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #5) > so not sure if the issue was really fixed or perhaps just hidden. Yeah, agree it's probably just gone latent.

[Bug target/96879] [11 Regresssion] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Stat

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 96879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/98136] [8/9/10 Regression] [aarch64] Internal compiler error with large classes and virtual methods since r8-5967-gf5470a77425a54efebfe1732488c40f05ef176d0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98136 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/98726] [10/11 Regression] SVE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|avieira at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/97141] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/98689] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/99781] [11 Regression] ICE in partial_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99781 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98119] [10/11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/99813] [11 Regression] SVE: Invalid assembly at -O3 (multiplier out of range in incb instruction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99813 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for looking at this. I agree swapping the constraints for operand 2 looks like the right fix, and brings it into line with *add3_aarch64". I think we need to swap operand 1 too though,

[Bug rtl-optimization/99560] aarch64: ICE (segfault) in LRA with SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99560 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99540] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 --- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 99560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/99252] SVE: ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99252 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Stat

[Bug target/99216] ICE in aarch64_sve::function_expander::expand() with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99216 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 99252 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/98917] SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=128 --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Stat

[Bug target/99102] [11 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=armv8.2-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99102 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 98917 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/98268] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with LTO and SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98268] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with LTO and SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: |[10 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/97141] [10 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] aarch64, |[10 Regression] aarch64,

[Bug tree-optimization/98726] [10/11 Regression] SVE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Stat

[Bug target/97141] [10 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 98726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/98119] [10 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] SVE: |[10 Regression] SVE: Wrong

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/99873] New: [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873 Bug ID: 99873 Summary: [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/99873] [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/99873] [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > We can also undo the splitting if SLP doesn't work out (keep the original > DR analysis chaining somewhere). Yeah, that sounds like something we s

[Bug tree-optimization/99873] [11 Regression] GCC no longer makes as much use of ST3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99873 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug debug/99973] New: -gsplit-dwarf uses host objcopy for cross compilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99973 Bug ID: 99973 Summary: -gsplit-dwarf uses host objcopy for cross compilers Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] False maybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I don't think we want any initialization unless we invent an explicitely > "uninitialized" state. Note that wide-int storage is large - I suppose

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/99866] gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h: 2 * passing structs ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99866 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 99866, which changed state. Bug 99866 Summary: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h: 2 * passing structs ? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99866 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 --- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- The previous patch skips the affected tests for now, on the basis that this PR is open and tracking the problem. The bug is very much still there though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9/10/11 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.4 |12.0 Assignee|rs

[Bug c/98852] [10/11 Regression] Conditional expression wrongly rejected for arm_neon.h vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98852 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/99929] SVE: Wrong code at -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99929 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99249] SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/98852] [10 Regression] Conditional expression wrongly rejected for arm_neon.h vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98852 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression] Conditional

[Bug target/99929] SVE: Wrong code at -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99929 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 --- Comment #4 from rs

[Bug c++/99246] [modules] ICE in write_location, at cp/module.cc:15687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99246 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99249] SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/99540] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|8.5 --- Comment #13 from r

[Bug middle-end/98689] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug middle-end/100130] New: R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 Bug ID: 100130 Summary: R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug middle-end/100130] R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-17 Ever confi

[Bug middle-end/100130] R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Version|

[Bug tree-optimization/97960] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r8-6511-g3ae129323d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |10.4 --- Comment #11 from

[Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/98268] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with LTO and SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/97141] [10 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |10.4 --- Comment #7 from r

[Bug tree-optimization/97960] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r8-6511-g3ae129323d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r8-6511-g3ae129323d150621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 95396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/98119] [10 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/99249] SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/99540] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug tree-optimization/95694] [9 Regression] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:59 since r9-7156-g33579b59aaf02eb7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95694 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/98302] [9 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug rtl-optimization/96796] [9 Regression] aarch64: ICE during RTL pass: reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 96757, which changed state. Bug 96757 Summary: aarch64：ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96757 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/96757] aarch64：ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96757 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|U

[Bug tree-optimization/97405] ICE in get_or_alloc_expr_for in code hoisting with SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > OK, looks like the code expects > > POLY_INT_CST [16, 16] /[ex] 16 > > to be constant folded - looks like poly_int_binop doesn't handle division

[Bug rtl-optimization/97497] gcse wrong code generation with partial register clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/97497] gcse wrong code generation with partial register clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the problem is a disconnect between compute_transp and the code in gcse.c itself. compute_transp considers %r12 to be transparent in all blocks despite the partial clobbers. But whethe

[Bug rtl-optimization/97497] gcse wrong code generation with partial register clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #6) > Alternatively I could also mark r12 as preserved across function calls for > -fpic in the backend. In fact all the bits we care about are preserv

[Bug target/96879] [11 Regresssion] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 49413 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49413 part1-patch Thanks for the summary and patches, and sorry for the delayed reply. Taking part1-patch firs

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 49414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49414 part2-patch Nice :-) For the constant_multiple_p calls that calculate a vector multiple, it might be goo

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to yangyang from comment #3) > The work is mainly composed of three parts: the generating of SVE > functions for "omp declare simd" in pass_omp_simd_clone, the supporting of > SVE

[Bug tree-optimization/97588] New: Overzealous SRA of boolean bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588 Bug ID: 97588 Summary: Overzealous SRA of boolean bitfields Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/97457] [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since r10-4752-g2d56600c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unass

[Bug rtl-optimization/97497] gcse wrong code generation with partial register clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirme

[Bug target/97269] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug tree-optimization/97711] New: Failure to optimise "x & 1 ? x - 1 : x" to "x & -2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711 Bug ID: 97711 Summary: Failure to optimise "x & 1 ? x - 1 : x" to "x & -2" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug testsuite/97680] [11 Regression] new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-16 Ever confir

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug bootstrap/97314] bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97314 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RES

[Bug tree-optimization/97904] ICE with AArch64 SVE intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|richard.sandiford at arm dot com |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97951] Template specialization of function template fails for fixed-sized SVE vector types.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/92294] alias attribute generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 --- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11) > The larger expressions should be subject to a propagation pass and not > arbitrarily complex static pattern matching. Maybe backprop is a su

[Bug tree-optimization/97960] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r8-6511-g3ae129323d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326 --- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- > 2) mad2.c > > float foo (double x, float y, float z) > { >return ( y * fabs (x) + z ); > } > > > mad2.c.098t.cunrolli: > > foo (double x, float y, float z) > { > double _1; > d

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] New: ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 Bug ID: 98037 Summary: ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/98037] ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >