https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11) > The larger expressions should be subject to a propagation pass and not > arbitrarily complex static pattern matching. Maybe backprop is a suitable > one to wire this in. Sounds good. backprop was originally added to deal with a similar “move things out of fold-const.c” problem (which is why it's currently so special-purpose).
