https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
I wonder if the CT_RELAXED_MEMORY cases should be following
on from CT_MEMORY rather than CT_SPECIAL_MEMORY. They're really
normal memory constraints that just happen to accept more than
a standard constraint.
