[Bug target/19718] [3.3 Regression] longcall attributed doesn't work for standard C function names

2005-02-16 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-16 22:39 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Does -fno-builtin cure the problem? See also pr19746 Just tried it out now, and it does seem to fix the problem. Unfortunately I didn't know about fno-builtin at the time, s

[Bug c/19718] New: longcall attributed doesn't work for standard C function names

2005-01-30 Thread jason at catapult dot com
ity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jason at catapult dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target

[Bug c/19718] longcall attributed doesn't work for standard C function names

2005-01-30 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-01-31 04:19 --- Created an attachment (id=8110) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8110&action=view) A simple program with differently-named function prototypes This program has function prototypes

[Bug target/19746] New: printf() optimisation ignores longcall attribute

2005-02-01 Thread jason at catapult dot com
Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jason at catapult dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GC

[Bug preprocessor/19836] New: -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread jason at catapult dot com
Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jason at catapult dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19836

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-09 06:27 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is documented to do this so this is not a bug. I thought -dD was supposed to NOT include predefined macros? Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19836

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-09 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-09 22:44 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > This is documented to do this so this is not a bug. > > > > I thought -dD was supposed to

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-09 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-09 23:50 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Subject: Re: -E -dD includes predefined macros > > jason at catapult dot com wrote:- > > > Where did you read this? This is what is written in the CPP and