https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120687
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120687
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I similarly see this generates ~200 lines of assembly for aarch64 compared to
~20 with Clang so I'd mark it as target-independent.
I think I remember a bug in the past about the need for loop re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120687
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
Yeah, for 8 elements we still have a mode but beyond 8 we at least cannot do a
segment access anymore. Then we try with even/odd or interleaved permutations.
I kind of wonder why the cost model doesn't reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120658
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120686
Bug ID: 120686
Summary: ICE on a lambda that uses parameter pack capture and
parameter pack indexing in decltype return type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120686
--- Comment #1 from Egor Bychin ---
FYI: clang has a similar issue
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/144540
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120665
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120687
Bug ID: 120687
Summary: RISC-V: very poor vector code gen for LMbench bw_mem
test case
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120673
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 61654
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61654&action=edit
Proposed fix which detects cyclic type dependencies
This patch fixes an ICE which will occur if cyclic dependen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120637
--- Comment #2 from Antony Lewis ---
Gemini and o3-pro, after some iteration, think this bug is due to reusing stale
cache pointers, which seems plausible to me and fits the erratic behaviour.
FWIW there is description and possible workaround a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120683
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|vector_loop generates |vector_loop generates poor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120661
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9244ea4bf556381d3f7fb66154dc8944ebeb005c
commit r16-1550-g9244ea4bf556381d3f7fb66154dc8944ebeb005c
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120661
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117974
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Summary|[16 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2230c7a505d88ac5fa6f85d7da5fb3a2e09a4cba
commit r12-11202-g2230c7a505d88ac5fa6f85d7da5fb3a2e09a4cba
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 116418, which changed state.
Bug 116418 Summary: [12 Regression] statement expressions as initializer for
decltype auto breaks in templates with optimization turned on and debug info
turned on due to gstatement-frontiers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
Bug ID: 120691
Summary: _Decimal128 arithmetic error under FE_UPWARD
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120692
Bug ID: 120692
Summary: Copying of adjacent fields can be merged
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #52 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 61656
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61656&action=edit
Patch
The attached modification to the v18 patch to gcc/ada/s-oscons-tmplt.c
fixes the gnat endian issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120693
Bug ID: 120693
Summary: [16 Regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: modref
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|14.1.0, 15.0|
Summary|[12/13 Regression] T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, can't we just keep cris doing what it wants and not penalize other arches
because of that?
Like:
--- gcc/function.cc.jj 2025-05-20 08:14:06.105410349 +0200
+++ gcc/function.cc 2025-06-17 20:03:03.45
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120694
Bug ID: 120694
Summary: endless compile in ranger at expand
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120694
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao Liu ---
stuck in the loop of ranger_cache::propagate_cache for niters.5_40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120694
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chenglulu at loongson dot cn,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120661
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120680
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120658
--- Comment #4 from newbie-02 ---
@Eric Botcazou: whow, thank you!
( despite I understand the analysis details as well as Chinese. )
One additional question: can you propose how to do better, how to avoid such
fails? Were programming rule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #33 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80b11a66973e6e5a33d0bd43ab2a97df5b7accd9
commit r12-11200-g80b11a66973e6e5a33d0bd43ab2a97df5b7accd9
Author: Richard Ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120673
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3dcc49945ea9ba0355d5c87686c0ed99e7c233d
commit r15-9841-gf3dcc49945ea9ba0355d5c87686c0ed99e7c233d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75ffef5c6fa4e6e9576285e0403c06728309ae3e
commit r16-1538-g75ffef5c6fa4e6e9576285e0403c06728309ae3e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
l$0, 24(%rdi,%rax)
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size foo, .-foo
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 16.0.0 20250617 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr120683]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120685
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC Crashes After C++23 |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120673
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba2f08152375e2c1c167ec921a0197e4c07efc6
commit r16-1546-gfba2f08152375e2c1c167ec921a0197e4c07efc6
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
Bug ID: 120689
Summary: Codegen optimization regression passing struct in
register in gcc 10+ on x86-64.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120690
Bug ID: 120690
Summary: Faster short testing of gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120690
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120688
Bug ID: 120688
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3 since
r15-579-ga9251ab3c91
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120665
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f577a9eb3c80594e46498d10b7eaacff47fe2286
commit r16-1547-gf577a9eb3c80594e46498d10b7eaacff47fe2286
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120665
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120681
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
What is this testcase meant to test? The only thing it *does* test is if this
trivial piece of code compiles at all (it doesn't test if the code generated is
correct, or anything else about it!)
It ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120681
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
I think it's supposed to demonstrate the problem, not go into the testsuite
as-is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This changed with r10-577-g325437b2a329715da7be4de792af052c19a0ac7b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113027
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a63b97e918b8592d0f6af94c5355efc82a49e06d
commit r16-1537-ga63b97e918b8592d0f6af94c5355efc82a49e06d
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120658
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> One additional question: can you propose how to do better, how to avoid such
> fails? Were programming rules violated here?
Declare a character buffer with the right size (TO_BASE_N) and pass it to
my_to_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61653&action=edit
gcc16-pr120621.patch
So, I think we want something like this patch + deal with the remaining 481
-Werror=forma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #37 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:448750aff5b000fbc79183f3ef316d71a6a1701b
commit r12-11201-g448750aff5b000fbc79183f3ef316d71a6a1701b
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #34 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:448750aff5b000fbc79183f3ef316d71a6a1701b
commit r12-11201-g448750aff5b000fbc79183f3ef316d71a6a1701b
Author: Georg-Joha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120658
--- Comment #6 from newbie-02 ---
@Eric Botcazou: :-) :-) :-) **applause**
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113027
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120678
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac62ff8ed0531ae5ffac4e5bf1dad2d60957b5a9
commit r16-1540-gac62ff8ed0531ae5ffac4e5bf1dad2d60957b5a9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120696
Bug ID: 120696
Summary: ICE: tree check: accessed elt 2 of 'tree_vec' with 1
elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16758
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120695
Bug ID: 120695
Summary: internal compiler error: in import_export_decl, at
cp/decl2.cc:3569
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3002d664d1137844c714645a841a48ab57d0eaa
commit r16-1555-gf3002d664d1137844c714645a841a48ab57d0eaa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120694
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Could you retry on trunk? This might be a dupe of bug 120661.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 120661 ***
Yes, it's fixed by r16-1550-g9244ea4b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
Bug ID: 120697
Summary: [16 regression] Bootstrap fails in
ix86_expand_prologue
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61657&action=edit
adler32.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-fno-shrink-wrap is fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
It bootstraps for me without --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto'.
Does it work with --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3' or
--with-build-config='bootstrap-lto'?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120697
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #5)
> 9380 gcc_assert (!crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate);
>
> It hits this assert which is added by the patch, maybe this assert is not
> needed.
I mean it's added by
78 matches
Mail list logo
