[Bug c++/120123] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss --- Bisection points to a670ebde3995481225ec62b29686ec07a21e5c10 (Drop targetm.promote_prototypes from C, C++ and Ada frontends) as culprit.

[Bug target/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #3 from Manuel Lauss --- Created attachment 61334 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61334&action=edit fixed example code Fixed example code: removed the custom header and exchanged it with stdint.h

[Bug target/120119] [15/16 Regression] GCC 15.1.0 ICEs (segfaults) compiling VK-GL-CTS on aarch64 with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a57 since r15-5422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120119 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/120122] [14/15/16 Regression] wrong code due to VCE of bool being pulled out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/120125] New: ICE when using -Os and std module together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125 Bug ID: 120125 Summary: ICE when using -Os and std module together Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |ipa CC|

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug tree-optimization/120031] Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e363ffefaceb9ff8fdeeead247c8337538e01db commit r16-400-g5e363ffefaceb9ff8fdeeead247c8337538e01db Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #105 from Sam James --- The libstdc++ changes still need to be committed. I don't know what the status of those is (not looked if posted, reviewed yet, etc). I'd suggest handling that in a new bug but up to you.

[Bug target/120067] RISC-V: x264 sub4x4_dct high icount

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120067 Robin Dapp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug target/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss --- I bisected and tested with the full source, but the core loop is function codec47_comp2() in example.c. The code for this function is noticeable smaller (4kB vs 6kB) with "gcc-16 -O3" compared to gcc-14/15 -

[Bug target/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou --- > I believe this bug is fixed by the following commit: > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit; > h=8b26ee407613cdbfc3fb2095c09ae28b4642fd63 > > This change enables generation of GNU stack notes in g

[Bug pch/14940] PCH largefile test fails on various platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 --- Comment #59 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16e301adf7b653c72d5c3cae1c7287877f3f20ff commit r16-399-g16e301adf7b653c72d5c3cae1c7287877f3f20ff Author: LIU Hao Date: Wed May

[Bug preprocessor/120061] [14 Regression] libqt6webengine fails static_assert (__LINE__ == 470, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- 14 version: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp.jj 2024-04-26 11:46:58.650218626 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp 2025-05-06 10:01:10.543208267 +0200 @@ -126,7 +126,9 @@ set p

[Bug ada/120110] Instantiation error record aggregate must use (), not []

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120110 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120126] New: Title: ICE in GCC with pack-dependent decltype in lambda: cp_type_quals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126 Bug ID: 120126 Summary: Title: ICE in GCC with pack-dependent decltype in lambda: cp_type_quals Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #106 from LIU Hao --- Both the other two patches are on the ML: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/670425.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681957.html

[Bug c++/120127] New: ICE in GCC when calling destructor of undefined type name in lambda (lookup_template_class crash)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120127 Bug ID: 120127 Summary: ICE in GCC when calling destructor of undefined type name in lambda (lookup_template_class crash) Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/120128] New: Excesive output in recursive lambda composition, that can lead to g++:fatal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120128 Bug ID: 120128 Summary: Excesive output in recursive lambda composition, that can lead to g++:fatal error Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/120065] [14/15/16 Regression] profile info corrupted by dom2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120065 --- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan --- Thanks for the analysis. I think this shows that the testcase I gave above was overly-reduced. I should have mentioned in the initial report that this code came from gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20060

[Bug c++/120129] New: Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 Bug ID: 120129 Summary: Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/120130] New: Cannot declare function template as friend in the presence of same named member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120130 Bug ID: 120130 Summary: Cannot declare function template as friend in the presence of same named member function Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/120067] RISC-V: x264 sub4x4_dct high icount

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120067 Paul-Antoine Arras changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCON

[Bug target/119361] RISC-V: x264 satd_4x4 stack spilling with mtune=generic-ooo for vls code but not on vla code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119361 Paul-Antoine Arras changed: What|Removed |Added CC||parras at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/120031] Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/120131] New: Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 Bug ID: 120131 Summary: Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/120074] [15/16 regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-ccp" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 since r15-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120074 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81475602c3dd57ff6987e5f902814e8e3a0a0dde commit r16-402-g81475602c3dd57ff6987e5f902814e8e3a0a0dde Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/120074] [15/16 regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-ccp" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 since r15-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120074 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a14d65f81e18e70144ceddfc3142a8103984919d commit r15-9625-ga14d65f81e18e70144ceddfc3142a8103984919d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/119977] [16 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with -march=znver4 -ggdb3 and bootstrap-lto since r16-152-g4f7b3c24112016

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119977 --- Comment #20 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #18) > * Bisecting between basepoints/gcc-15 and trunk for a difference in a > constant source file (reduced gimple-match-6.cc from > r16-152-g4f7b3c24112016) yields r15-7652

[Bug ipa/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #6 from Manuel Lauss --- it seems the recursion of codec47_block() is confusing gcc-16 here. The full source contains other decoders structured very similar to codec47_block() but without recursion, these are as fast with gcc-16 as

[Bug tree-optimization/120074] [15/16 regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-ccp" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 since r15-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120074 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #9 from Jørgen Kvalsvik --- Created attachment 61335 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61335&action=edit Patch: fix, printf properly on systems without %zu I just posted this on gcc-patches. It should fix the issu

[Bug c++/120129] Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/115777] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] Severe performance regression on insertion sort at -O2 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- commit 76c33109074b8e7cf6c326116b46792070122c7b (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Richard Biener Date: Mon Mar 17 15:04:28 2025 +0100 tree-optimization/115 - STLF fails with BB vectorization

[Bug target/115777] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] Severe performance regression on insertion sort at -O2 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- It's not fully fixed unless you use generic tuning, so let's keep it open. Mitigation in source should be to place #pragma GCC novector before the loop. Note this only works for GCC 14 and up (that fix

[Bug jit/101491] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h conflicts between different GCC installations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- The difference is that tailr1 pass now turns recursion into loop. GCC15 does: Basic block 11 has extra exit edges Basic block 33 has extra exit edges Basic block 28 has extra exit edges Basic block 23 has ex

[Bug c++/120130] Cannot declare function template as friend in the presence of same named member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120130 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- MSVC and EDG both reject it too for similar reasons as GCC.

[Bug target/113939] Switch m68k to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939 --- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7) > I will verify now that the M2 issue is related to enabling LRA. The M2 issue is indeed related to LRA. Will test Fortran now.

[Bug ipa/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/120132] New: JMP to target function from the middle of the current if the results layout are compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120132 Bug ID: 120132 Summary: JMP to target function from the middle of the current if the results layout are compatible Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #19 from John David Anglin --- This fixed problems with my ada build which doesn't have the Debian patches: === acats Summary === # of expected passes2328 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is

[Bug c++/120134] New: internal compiler error: in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120134 Bug ID: 120134 Summary: internal compiler error: in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9488 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/116176] SARIF output doesn't yet capture nesting of logical locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116176 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f25e178b8c2cc868168b0a29ab03260fbefa4ff7 commit r16-414-gf25e178b8c2cc868168b0a29ab03260fbefa4ff7 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/120032] Fails to pattern match clz from DeBruijn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I'll note that we might want to match 31 - clz (val) aka the table lookup, not 31 - table_lookup, as that will better in case the result is offset by a constant or a variable where the latter would even

[Bug sarif-replay/117988] RFE: Logical locations for sarif-replay errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117988 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52fe9502eb153f87154cfcb6a58ab84164d7e1d9 commit r16-416-g52fe9502eb153f87154cfcb6a58ab84164d7e1d9 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug sarif-replay/117988] RFE: Logical locations for sarif-replay errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117988 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/116176] SARIF output doesn't yet capture nesting of logical locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116176 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/120108] Feature request: Command-line option to rename module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120108 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/120125] [15/16 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group when using -Os or -fdeclone-ctor-dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-06 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982 since r16-244-gce489c870bf28e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6f68c04f440f981b281c5ad4c335761bc7d2882 commit r15-9629-gb6f68c04f440f981b281c5ad4c335761bc7d2882 Author: Andrew MacLeo

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982 since r16-244-gce489c870bf28e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93b85bdf830477fec8db1d8afcaca13530776161 commit r14-11745-g93b85bdf830477fec8db1d8afcaca13530776161 Author: Andrew MacLe

[Bug c++/120129] Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 --- Comment #2 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Bisection-found commit: r12-6008-g06d5dcef72542b Reducing

[Bug c++/120135] New: Strange -Wunitialized behavior with struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135 Bug ID: 120135 Summary: Strange -Wunitialized behavior with struct Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/120129] Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list since r12-6008-g06d5dcef72542b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug c++/120129] Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list since r12-6008-g06d5dcef72542b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 --- Comment #5 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Created attachment 61339 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61339&action=edit reduced.cpp

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Terzi --- After a fruitful discussion in Stack Overflow, I understand that the model set of integers in Fortran is symmetric about zero according to the formula in section 16.4 of https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/2

[Bug c++/120135] Strange -Wuninitialized behavior with struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61340 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61340&action=edit Testcase from the godbolt link Next time please attach the testcase. Note bugzilla has a way to paste in the a

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb5829a01651d427a63a12c44ecc8baa47dbfc83 commit r16-420-gfb5829a01651d427a63a12c44ecc8baa47dbfc83 Author: Martin Jambor Date: Tu

[Bug c++/120129] Internal Compiler Error (ICE) with decltype(auto) and nested initializer list since r12-6008-g06d5dcef72542b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120129 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76c882e341cb330a4e9f677a8c3541d573820255 commit r16-422-g76c882e341cb330a4e9f677a8c3541d573820255 Author: Martin Jambor Date: Tu

[Bug c++/120133] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133 --- Comment #2 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- bisecting

[Bug fortran/119928] [15/16 Regression] Bogus "Interface mismatch" in gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90 with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7a2b8b76ae0c8f1e49c780aa82ebb5f0325f515 commit r16-423-ge7a2b8b76ae0c8f1e49c780aa82ebb5f0325f515 Author: Thomas Koenig Date: Tu

[Bug c++/120136] New: internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with -1 elts in add_to_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120136 Bug ID: 120136 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with -1 elts in add_to_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:612 Product: gcc Vers

[Bug tree-optimization/120135] Strange -Wuninitialized behavior with struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The warning is correct. SRA makes some odd decisions which causes the diagnostic to sometimes show up and sometimes does not show up.

[Bug c++/120112] -Wmismatched-tags -Wnamespaces leads to internal_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120112 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccf0b93b3ccf67b98fbd5096852c369d2cac7904 commit r16-424-gccf0b93b3ccf67b98fbd5096852c369d2cac7904 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/119667] libstdc++ configure checks for libbacktrace need atomics for void* and size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119667 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86627faec10da53d7532805019e5296fcf15ac09 commit r16-427-g86627faec10da53d7532805019e5296fcf15ac09 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/120029] Dangling iterator usage in std::filesystem::path::operator+=(const std::filesystem::path &p) when this == p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120029 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a067cbcdcc5f599a2b7d607e89674533d23c652d commit r16-425-ga067cbcdcc5f599a2b7d607e89674533d23c652d Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/70560] Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86627faec10da53d7532805019e5296fcf15ac09 commit r16-427-g86627faec10da53d7532805019e5296fcf15ac09 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/117905] PSTL algos in require copy-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117905 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df1d436d17c8280bd835b045bd7babf5058a7154 commit r16-426-gdf1d436d17c8280bd835b045bd7babf5058a7154 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/120136] internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with -1 elts in add_to_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120136 --- Comment #1 from Luke Dalessandro --- Created attachment 61342 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61342&action=edit actual cvise output (also ICEs 13,14,15) This was the test case that cvise actually returned. It's messier

[Bug tree-optimization/120065] [14/15/16 Regression] profile info corrupted by dom2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120065 --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- FWIW, the following testcase seems to be more representative of the original problem I saw when looking at gcc.c-torture/execute/20060420-1.c: $ cat t2.c void foo(float *dst, float *src) { int j; for (j =

[Bug fortran/33285] integer too big compile error in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33285 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vterzi1996 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 Vladimir Terzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICA

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/118526] infinite compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118526 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/33285] integer too big compile error in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33285 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gsocshubham at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/92639] Error: Integer too big for its kind at (1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92639 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c++/120130] Cannot declare function template as friend in the presence of same named member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120130 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- clang started to acecpt this for -std=c++2a in clang 9. Would be interesting to make sure this is not a clang bug since 3 major compilers reject it while clang is the odd one out.

[Bug lto/113208] [15 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208 --- Comment #38 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d5a6a26e28d15ac05f59ee4d3c3d7d4d42acac3 commit r14-11743-g6d5a6a26e28d15ac05f59ee4d3c3d7d4d42acac3 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/120132] JMP to target function from the middle of the current if the results layout are compatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120132 --- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin --- Another example: struct A { int i; int j; }; A g(); int test1() { A a = g(); return a.i; } GCC-15 produces the following assembly: test1(): sub rsp, 8 call g() add rsp, 8 ret

[Bug ipa/120120] [16 Regression] gcc-16: performance regression with -O3 compared to gcc-15 since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120120 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Forgot to say, -fno-optimize-sibbling-calls re-enables the cloning & inline.

[Bug c++/119305] [14 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group with constexpr virtual and constexpr instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/109464] gcc does not instantiate constructor for explicitly instantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d9800938ef61b7978abb33a8b202beeb3efed6b commit r14-11744-g9d9800938ef61b7978abb33a8b202beeb3efed6b Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug middle-end/114512] Optimization on "test if bit N is set" pattern ((C >> x) & 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114512 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cd741dcbd3729863ab005d7ec61a890e0a193f1 commit r16-411-g4cd741dcbd3729863ab005d7ec61a890e0a193f1 Author: Shreya Munnangi Date: Tue M

[Bug c++/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d5a6a26e28d15ac05f59ee4d3c3d7d4d42acac3 commit r14-11743-g6d5a6a26e28d15ac05f59ee4d3c3d7d4d42acac3 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Terzi --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > No gfortran is correct this code is invalid without an extra option. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33285 *** So you are implying that

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #9) > Created attachment 61335 [details] > Patch: fix, printf properly on systems without %zu > > I just posted this on gcc-patches. It should fix the issue in

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Possibly using %llu and (unsigned long long) casts on the value would be a > good fix. I tested this and it didn't completely fix fails: FAIL: expected: '

[Bug c++/119252] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119252 Luke Dalessandro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/119252] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119252 --- Comment #2 from Luke Dalessandro --- Sorry, this test case went to the wrong PR. Meant to go to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133.

[Bug c++/120133] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133 Bug ID: 120133 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/120133] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0571638a6bad932b226ada98b167fa47a47d838 commit r16-428-gd0571638a6bad932b226ada98b167fa47a47d838 Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: M

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 --- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Vladimir Terzi from comment #5) > After a fruitful discussion in Stack Overflow, I understand that the model > set of integers in Fortran is symmetric about zero according to the form

[Bug fortran/120131] Misleading and unnecessary error message due to range check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/33285] integer too big compile error in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33285 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 120131 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

  1   2   >