https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286
--- Comment #10 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #9)
> … Or perhaps we
> could do the optimisation in gimple, so that there is only one loop-carried
> dependency coming into expand.
That is, replace:
[loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286
--- Comment #9 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> Richard, do you think this is something early-ra in aarch64 is well-placed
> to address? Or is there perhaps a realistic IRA solution?
I don't think the RAs can ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 regression] Sporadic |[14 regression] Sporadic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||15.0
Summary|[15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> Started with r15-3530-gdfb63765e994be. Before that rev we accepted the
> code. But GCC 14 also ICEs and GCC 13 says:
r15-3530 was backported to 14 branch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119575
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Or perhaps this should be a P2. I'm honestly not sure. We should fix it
anyway ;).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119575
--- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> By placing line numbers on every line of the program, once cannot simply
> copy and
> paste the code into a file for testing. The code as written contains i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 102805, which changed state.
Bug 102805 Summary: at -O2, spurious stringop-overflow warning writing to
std::vector::back()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102805
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560
--- Comment #3 from Scott Smedley ---
H, I rebuilt from scratch to give you the full build.log but it worked this
time! I build it a 3rd time and it worked too, so I can't reproduce the error.
Sorry for the kerfuffle.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119440
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0
commit r15-9139-g358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
--- Comment #9 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For the ICE i'm not sure why i'm not seeing it. The input file should have had
flatten enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to ak from comment #9)
> For the ICE i'm not sure why i'm not seeing it. The input file should have
> had flatten enabled.
> gcc_checking_assert (to->calls_comdat_local);
--enable-checking=rel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
I've recreated it too. I'll have someone on my team have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |c
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582
Bug ID: 119582
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with
-fsanitize=pointer-subtract
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60955
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60955&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-02
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119580
Bug ID: 119580
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in
comp_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:9595
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Bug ID: 119583
Summary: -fomit-frame-pointer does not work as expected for
-mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
--- Comment #1 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118118
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c708fa411fa708e7abc717b0880d6f708967a37
commit r15-9140-g4c708fa411fa708e7abc717b0880d6f708967a37
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581
Bug ID: 119581
Summary: Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118118
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119580
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119387
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0
commit r15-9139-g358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118982
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118982
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12533c0c8b27dcbb1b83517bf4eb09faa98bf814
commit r15-9142-g12533c0c8b27dcbb1b83517bf4eb09faa98bf814
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> bergner@kubota:COBOL$ ./a.out
> Hello, world!
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The return address at the beginning of main ends up not being the address we
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115824
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119575
Bug ID: 119575
Summary: ICE parsing expression with overloaded operators
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Bug ID: 119574
Summary: [15 regression] ICE on lambda in default template
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119574
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119573
Bug ID: 119573
Summary: nvptx: PTX '.const', constant state space
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
URL: https://inbox.sourceware.org/87a590lv1b.fsf@dem-tschwi
ng-1.schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This fixes it for GCC 14, but I'm not sure why the compiler can't tell this
isn't true already:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc
@@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ _G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #8)
> The Linux kernel disables -Warray-bounds in GCC 9 and later (and
> -Wstringop-overflow unconditionally).
> https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/blame/
> 5be5ecdaf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > I might be missing to set some elem_len or span or ...
>
> Testcase:
Running the program (compiled with: -Og -g -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
Bug ID: 119584
Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a
function with concept requires an ICE during inlining
at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
Bug 119482 depends on bug 119584, which changed state.
Bug 119584 Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function
with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581
--- Comment #3 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2)
> Thanks Pan. I've got an intern working in this space, and this may be a
> good exercise for them. So definitely reach out before you dive in to see
> if she's gotten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The concept causes the function to be in the comdat of the base function rather
than just the function itself.
That is:
Same comdat group as: _Z1dIPiEvT_/7
References:
Referring: _Z1dIPiEvT_/7 (ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
So some AIX documentation specifies a language tag value (7) for Cobol in the
traceback table:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.1?topic=ops-tbtag-pseudo-op
...so this fixes the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 119584, which changed state.
Bug 119584 Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function
with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86-64
--- Comment #1 from Siddhes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063fbd5a10d47d4957d605ca917480d02e054249
commit r15-9143-g063fbd5a10d47d4957d605ca917480d02e054249
Author: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks Pan. I've got an intern working in this space, and this may be a good
exercise for them. So definitely reach out before you dive in to see if she's
gotten to this issue yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
So what is happening is we have an alias for the comdat function that will
cause the ICE and also at the same time we remove calls to another comdat
function because we prove it is not called and then we ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119585
Bug ID: 119585
Summary: counted_by in redefined structs.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, ak at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563
>
> ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
--- Comment #13 from chenglulu ---
There is a problem now. When gcc supports both _Float128 and Q suffixes, the
libquadmath library will be automatically linked when the fortran program is
compiled using gfortran compiled with this version of gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
--- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #13)
> There is a problem now. When gcc supports both _Float128 and Q suffixes, the
> libquadmath library will be automatically linked when the fortran program is
> compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Wait I think there is a typo:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index c1c8987ec8b..58774ded3d5 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ build_list_conv (tree type, tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] SSE4 |[14/ Regression] SSE4 code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alfie Richards
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c66b2f14b5d4cd46388d79b4a73a77433e1dd22
commit r12-11010-g0c66b2f14b5d4cd46388d79b4a73a77433e1dd22
Author: Andrew Carlot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119559
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de92ac6f11e605987421fe1443b5b81ff172dbb6
commit r15-9120-gde92ac6f11e605987421fe1443b5b81ff172dbb6
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119549
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae2912748b9913fe9cd198db1b3fa704d0cbc728
commit r15-9121-gae2912748b9913fe9cd198db1b3fa704d0cbc728
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Cameron Angus from comment #2)
> Yeah I realized afterwards there was a limit so I guess that is why.
> Unfortunately even compressed it's a little over 1MB. Can I link to external
> hosting?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118699
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5eb93522a661481caa53d4d1a716888b5b11f4da
commit r14-11491-g5eb93522a661481caa53d4d1a716888b5b11f4da
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116572
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5312a8f62a6bcae36f6aa40f88c8b58dfae7db21
commit r14-11495-g5312a8f62a6bcae36f6aa40f88c8b58dfae7db21
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119534
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though wonder if for the boolean vectors one couldn't actually emit different
code altogether. If the whole vec_offset is all falses or all trues, we could
just broadcast the same memory, otherwise load bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119568
Bug ID: 119568
Summary: [avr] ICE: in find_widening_optab_handler_and_mode, at
optabs-query.cc:498
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119561
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119554
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119564
--- Comment #4 from Cameron Angus ---
Okay this is rather annoying, this reduced repro no longer crashes on a more
recent build, but my original code still does, so the underlying bug is still
there.
I was told by a contributor that the bug app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119567
Bug ID: 119567
Summary: "unknown operator" in pointer subtraction diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60946&action=edit
Semi reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119547
--- Comment #8 from 曾治金 ---
This is my temporary patch and may be it's incorrect. Perhaps I am unable to
solve this issue, but I would like to offer this patch as a reference.
>From 2068f7493da45d67699de587224510659fe776a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119565
Bug ID: 119565
Summary: 13-17% regression of botan CAS128 and DES on zen4
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119563
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 60950
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60950&action=edit
gcc15-pr119563.patch
Untested full patch.
Whether it ICEs or not depends on what actually is beyond the alloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116572
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0, 14.1.0
Target Milestone|13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #10)
> It doesn't really help for the PR119387 test case, perhaps not surprising
> because it optimizes freeing not allocation:
>
> Summary
> ./gcc/cc1plus-opt -w -s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
Bug ID: 119576
Summary: Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: drive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
101 - 200 of 221 matches
Mail list logo