https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113076
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #4 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Comment on attachment 60821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60821
Excerpt of the AArch64 assembly
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -S -fverbose-asm -Ofast -mabi=lp64 -march=armv9-a+sve2
-ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Also, I wonder about different calls in the same function with different ABIs
(whether from IPA-RA which finds out some call doesn't clobber some reg while
another one does, or function attributes, ...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #14)
> It has taken me a ridiculously long time to figure out that you are creating
> trees for numeric values, and then doing arithmetic on those trees at
> compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119062
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #2 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Created attachment 60822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60822&action=edit
Excerpt of the RISC-V assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12b2c414b6d0e0d1b3d328b58d654c19c30bee8c
commit r15-8445-g12b2c414b6d0e0d1b3d328b58d654c19c30bee8c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Context of the following (sub-)task: nvptx is '!TARGET_SUPPORTS_ALIASES', but
the host usually is 'TARGET_SUPPORTS_ALIASES', and therefore invokes the
'gcc/cp/optimize.cc:can_alias_cdtor' optimization, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
Bug ID: 119373
Summary: RISC-V: missed unrolling opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #1 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Created attachment 60821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60821&action=edit
Excerpt of the AArch64 assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118615
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I'd at least suggest:
--- gcc/lra-constraints.cc.jj 2025-02-01 00:47:07.926078697 +0100
+++ gcc/lra-constraints.cc 2025-03-19 18:54:08.035516274 +0100
@@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ static machine_mode curr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure?
I put all of the details I have found about the bisect in PR 118615. Including
the small testcase whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119373
--- Comment #3 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
Comment on attachment 60822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60822
Excerpt of the RISC-V assembly
$ riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -S -fverbose-asm -Ofast -mabi=lp64d
-march=rv64gcv_zvl256b_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
> Reduced testcase:
> ...
> S a[3];
Array size 1 is enough. My reduced testcase was:
#pragma omp declare target
struct SSD {
SSD();
} sd[1];
#pragma omp end declare target
input1.ii.018t.ompex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Bug ID: 119374
Summary: armv7ve+neon-vfpv4: Miscompilation with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119375
Bug ID: 119375
Summary: Some autofdo test cases fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119375
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Do the PR117790 fixes help this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105848
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
commit r14-11422-g9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||myokaski at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; shift_36 = 19 - _8;
(insn 20 19 0 (set (reg/v:SI 133 [ shiftD.6157 ])
(minus:SI (const_int 19 [0x13])
(reg:SI 121 [ _8 ]))) "/app/example.cpp":33:11 discrim 1 -1
(nil))
;; vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> Looks related to pr118747, where an elemental subroutine was used
> instead of a function.
It has some similarities. Since Andre did the fix on that one, we need to se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0
Keywords|needs-bisecti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This was fixed by r15-6779-g20385cb92cbd4a .
Which means the workaround is to use `-march=armv8.3-a+pauth`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108152
--- Comment #4 from nightstrike ---
>From Andrew on IRC: use __extension__ before __SIZE_TYPE__
This should alleviate the pedantic warnings while (I believe) not invalidating
the point of the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Bug ID: 119376
Summary: protobuf-29.2 fails to build (error: cannot tail-call:
call may throw exception that does not propagate)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-19
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119270
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c443e128802bd93158a3db7c4edf5fc1fc76c8d
commit r15-8449-g6c443e128802bd93158a3db7c4edf5fc1fc76c8d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is a better example:
```
void f(int *);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void h(int *b)
{
[[clang::musttail]]
return f(b);
}
void g(int *b)
{
int a;
h(&a);
[[clang::musttail]]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Guess the bug is in emit_partial_init_fini_fn
/* We will emit 'init' twice, and it is modified in-place during
gimplification. Make a copy here. */
if (omp_target)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60817|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119358
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119357
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9030c54d3ff983cf07752173737f627a2e458426
commit r15-8295-g9030c54d3ff983cf07752173737f627a2e458426
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks related to pr118747, where an elemental subroutine was used
instead of a function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119350
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ecf468c9a30b5a6da86812b912fe3368437c8b9
commit r15-8446-g7ecf468c9a30b5a6da86812b912fe3368437c8b9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #14)
> "Wait for me! I am your leader!"
>
> I am not *used* to this.
>
> What I *am* used to is people telling me there's a problem in my code, and
> then standin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
commit r14-11422-g9a69c36417ad597ea2dce20fd704878c3727bc38
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13 Regression]
|t
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
