https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119374
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
;; shift_36 = 19 - _8;
(insn 20 19 0 (set (reg/v:SI 133 [ shiftD.6157 ])
(minus:SI (const_int 19 [0x13])
(reg:SI 121 [ _8 ]))) "/app/example.cpp":33:11 discrim 1 -1
(nil))
;; vect_yx_40.8_78 = vect_yy_34.7_80 >> shift_36;
(insn 34 29 35 (set (reg:V4SI 162)
(neg:V4SI (reg:V4SI 158))) "/app/example.cpp":39:5 -1
(nil))
(insn 35 34 36 (set (reg:V4SI 161 [ vect_yx_40.8_78 ])
(unspec:V4SI [
(reg:V4SI 142 [ vect_yy_34.7D.6181 ])
(reg:V4SI 162)
] VSHLQ_S)) "/app/example.cpp":39:5 -1
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (ashiftrt:V4SI (reg:V4SI 142 [ vect_yy_34.7D.6181 ])
(reg:V4SI 158))
(nil)))
Confirmed, I have seen this before.