https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81aa9488321dea5ed1d55d0dfb1a72f362a1a24f
commit r15-7266-g81aa9488321dea5ed1d55d0dfb1a72f362a1a24f
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Jan 23 12:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
For the time being you could go the ext-dce workaround I added in
r15-6793-g03faac50791380 and disable the pass when computing the DF problems
will
likely go out of hands.
I agree that avoiding whole func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a48079c15fda4863b02eb253e473c57a5105528
commit r15-7268-g5a48079c15fda4863b02eb253e473c57a5105528
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Jan 23 14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117688
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfb57d62c743235284f9b31a88c6ceed9971d27a
commit r15-7267-gbfb57d62c743235284f9b31a88c6ceed9971d27a
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Jan 23 12:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108053
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Libc++ fixed an equivalent issue with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e948cab07d68c240723a12cdc151d09c5cef87ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
Thanks for the quick fix Jason. The MLIR testsuite now passes too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
Yash Shinde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Yash.Shinde at windriver dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|15.0
Last reconfirmed|2023-03-13 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
Passing -fdisable-tree-rebuild_frequencies1 to the LTO linking step
brings back the original performance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #21 from Richard Sandiford ---
I should have said, but: another reason for suggesting rtl-ssa is that it is
usually self-updating. My long-term hope is that we'll be able to maintain it
between passes, when we have consecutive passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118429
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118691
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118320
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek ---
with that f = 1 I get
./cc1.r14-4971 -quiet -O2 -march=znver1 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
-fno-stack-protector pr109093.c; gcc -o pr109093{,.s}; ./pr109093
./cc1.r14-4972 -quiet -O2 -march=znver1 -ftrivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118691
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Please add -fno-strict-aliasing and try again.
Already on. Full options are:
-fprofile-generate -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -Ofast -fomit-frame-pointer -flto=auto -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118693
Bug ID: 118693
Summary: istream& getline (istream& is, string& str, char
delim) does not return with long input
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-checking|
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
> + if ((TREE_CODE (ref) == CONST_DECL && TREE_STATIC (ref))
> + || DECL_MERGEABLE (ref))
LGTM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118673
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #18)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
> > + if ((TREE_CODE (ref) == CONST_DECL && TREE_STATIC (ref))
> > + || DECL_MERGEABLE (ref))
>
> LGTM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118413
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0420cc224db64efe87cbe2f45d4d7ba8deb9eb0
commit r14-11259-gf0420cc224db64efe87cbe2f45d4d7ba8deb9eb0
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Bonzini ---
Yes, I suggested the MD problem because it did solve gambit performance issues
with fwprop for good, but RTL-SSA is certainly applicable.
Also, once all RD uses are converted to RTL-SSA it should really be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #23 from Richard Sandiford ---
FWIW, running locally on x86 with fold_mem_offsets disabled (admittedly with
rtl checking), I see:
combiner : 0.91 ( 0%)21M ( 0%)
late combiner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117506
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118689
Bug ID: 118689
Summary: [15 regression] Abort compiling
m2pim_NumberIO_BinToStr
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117892
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118689
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117892
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d07e7bf13d4aec794dd25b5090c139b4d78283d
commit r15-7269-g3d07e7bf13d4aec794dd25b5090c139b4d78283d
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81233
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79164
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79959
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118495
--- Comment #15 from Brecht Sanders ---
So what is needed to be able to use gdc to build a simple "Hello world" program
for Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78208
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #19 from Richard Sandiford ---
Mind if I take this and try converting it to rtl-ssa? I think that would be
more forward-looking, rather than adding more custom (dominator walk) code to
the pass itself. Also, the switch to rtl-ssa d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114052
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
I have an alternate patch fixing maybe_lower_iteration_bound, I think that's
the only place we have to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118684
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b02b8f65ef60be77f3f93945e2a6b463edaa0aa
commit r15-7264-g7b02b8f65ef60be77f3f93945e2a6b463edaa0aa
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116073
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
> Created attachment 60298
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60298&action=edit
> Proposed fix for 32 bit
>
> Apologies for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118692
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/expr.cc b/gcc/expr.cc
index 7f3149b85ee..10467f82c0d 100644
--- a/gcc/expr.cc
+++ b/gcc/expr.cc
@@ -11806,6 +11806,14 @@ expand_expr_real_1 (tree exp, rtx target, machine_mode
tmode,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
mauro russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ing.russomauro at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118125
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
I guess I should have started with looking at annotated assembly. The
hot loop in the hot functions changes from:
53 : ,-> 5534e0: lea(%r11,%rax,1),%rsi
659 : | 5534e4: mov(%rsi),%edi
48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118691
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Isn't this a dup of bug 115450 ?
Don't believe so. This is only showing up with PGO for me, but it's only during
training, so I suspect -fprofile-generate is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|12.5
Summary|Race condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And for backports we want some minimal change, not revamping where the object
files are located.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc6b949c553a3be1ce4d6671fb8a9de213ede114
commit r15-7271-gdc6b949c553a3be1ce4d6671fb8a9de213ede114
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118693
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60315
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60315&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118127
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50c111ecd1ae8eb8af0e7938305de7af892ba9ab
commit r14-11260-g50c111ecd1ae8eb8af0e7938305de7af892ba9ab
Author: Siddhesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118693
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can't reproduce this with upstream GCC or with gcc-14.2.1-3.fc40.x86_64
tmp$ wc input.txt
22 4930 input.txt
tmp$ xxd input.txt | tail -2
1330: 4141 4141 4141 4141 4141 4141 4141 3e0a A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118127
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116073
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115458
--- Comment #9 from Robin Dapp ---
Bisecting further only leads to the commit that introduced the vector ABI.
Comparing the dumps with and without vector ABI is very tedious because a lot
of things differ.
It looks like we cannot create a relo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118688
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think tracer should already do this?
Gimple-ssa-path-split.cc has some code which splits the path except it rejects
it to a candidate due to thinking it will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|patch splitting should |path splitting should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression]
|std:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #17 from Christoph Müllner ---
I reproduced the slow-down with a recent master on a 5950X:
* no-mem-fold-offset: 4m58.226s
* mem-fold-offset: 11m19.311s (+127%)
More details from -ftime-report:
* no-mem-fold-offset: df reaching defs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118655
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a6ddbf7b241e1cd9f73495ea373b0a12015bb07
commit r15-7263-g3a6ddbf7b241e1cd9f73495ea373b0a12015bb07
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Bonzini ---
> Can someone help me find what Paolo referenced as "the multiple definitions
> DF problem
> that was introduced for fwprop in 2009"?
Yes, the patch is at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2009-J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #18 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> So if we add:
> if ((rand() & 1))
> arr[i] *= -1;
>
> For the initialization loop.
>
> And increase the 2D size from 256 to 1000 (th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101625
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0
Summary|[12/13/14/15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 60322
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60322&action=edit
Patch part 1
This fixes the memory corruption due to false freeing of the
symbol during resolution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105227
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60323
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60323&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118697
Bug ID: 118697
Summary: static_assert message is not escaped
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The ICE:
```
:23:17: internal compiler error: in keep_template_parm, at
cp/pt.cc:11099
23 | static_assert( is_foo> );
| ^~~~
0x290bff5 diagnostic_context::diagnostic_imp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60325
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60325&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the reduced testcase worked in GCC 13 but the original testcase was
rejected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116860
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Summary|[15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60326
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60326&action=edit
Semi reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60326|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116860
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15dba7dfba8b7800ac7b74213171e4df9bc32bb9
commit r15-7281-g15dba7dfba8b7800ac7b74213171e4df9bc32bb9
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed Jan 29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60327|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118696
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-29
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96945
Bug 96945 depends on bug 110137, which changed state.
Bug 110137 Summary: implement clang -fassume-sane-operator-new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116868
Bug 116868 depends on bug 110137, which changed state.
Bug 110137 Summary: implement clang -fassume-sane-operator-new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
Bug 109442 depends on bug 110137, which changed state.
Bug 110137 Summary: implement clang -fassume-sane-operator-new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118477
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9ac0ad1e9a4ceec2d354ac0368da7462bea5675
commit r15-7278-gd9ac0ad1e9a4ceec2d354ac0368da7462bea5675
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #11 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Should be fixed.
Thanks! I can confirm that the gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 failure has been
fixed on aarch64-linux-gnu.
But unfortunately the gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92023
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
I think we should try to behave better by default here, for QOI reasons. I'm
not sure the implementation is conforming.
As for how to improve our standard behavior it might be possible to simply
ignore a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116010
>
> --- Comment #11 from Thiago Jung Bauermann org> ---
> (In reply to Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116073
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
commit r15-7279-g62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116073
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118010
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
commit r15-7279-g62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118183
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
commit r15-7279-g62abe069506e67d2668e8de7c5e00c118c60d8a7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-09-02 00:00:00 |2025-1-29
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118008
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
So PR 118695 has a C testcase for a similar ICE. The problem is the code there
is undefined while here it might be well defined (but I am not so sure).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118695
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60320&action=edit
ICE in gen_movdi instead of gen_movsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651
Bug 116651 depends on bug 110137, which changed state.
Bug 110137 Summary: implement clang -fassume-sane-operator-new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
