https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> > > r12-7803-gf0530882d99abc
> >
> > .. but that patch got backported to 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118046
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] wrong code |[15 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118008
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I was not able to recreate the compiler crash using a cross-compiler to
arm-eabi, using either GCC tip or GCC 14 branch. Are you building on an
arm-linux system? Are there any such systems left in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Miller ---
In case you're interested, here's the failing part of the Qt sources:
```
std::vector extContexts { { /* 0 - Always available */ } };
```
https://github.com/qt/qtquick3d/blob/6.8.0/src/runtimerender/rende
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118024
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9537ca5ad9bc23d7e9c446b4a7cbb98f63bddb6a
commit r15-6253-g9537ca5ad9bc23d7e9c446b4a7cbb98f63bddb6a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118011
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18f0b7d5f370c47633837e935f8a6e1b8616b56b
commit r15-6252-g18f0b7d5f370c47633837e935f8a6e1b8616b56b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118041
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks, I'll apply this patch, but for next time please just send the patch to
gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org - there's no need to open a bug if you already have a
patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20241214122823-r15-6251-ga6a15bc5b77c87-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.0 20241214 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117120
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe21668f3a7a0f07fa1e79ef2561a107a09a67d
commit r14-11089-gcfe21668f3a7a0f07fa1e79ef2561a107a09a67d
Author: Gaius Mulley
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043
Bug ID: 118043
Summary: -Wattributes: [[gnu::access(wo, n)]]: False positive
with VLA
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118025
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118044
Bug ID: 118044
Summary: -Wvla-parameter: False positive with [[gnu::access(wo,
n)]]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118041
Bug ID: 118041
Summary: install.texi typos in --enable-host-pie
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118023
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118024
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118023
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f4e85a954d24cc30bf85f4040fcd204bd5e23fd
commit r15-6254-g7f4e85a954d24cc30bf85f4040fcd204bd5e23fd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116807
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103827
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Original testcase is solved by
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671599.html
We still won't optimize longer strings because _M_create is not inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87502
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671599.html
optimizes the string constructors. Having strlen pass catching more cases
would be nice, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80331
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94960
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15)
> > Oh, sorry, that was linked earlier. But still, isn't the problem that
> > "inline"
> > is too strong?
> Do we have some data on this?
I at least don't have any.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117924
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812
--- Comment #3 from jeffrey.cliff at gmail dot com ---
> replace ZSTD_CLEVEL_DEFAULT with 3
check
diff --git a/libbacktrace/zstdtest.c b/libbacktrace/zstdtest.c
index b9552ab1b88..0835ce5398d 100644
--- a/libbacktrace/zstdtest.c
+++ b/libbacktr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 59868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59868&action=edit
Fix for this PR
It needs tidying up and the testcase dejagnu-ifying but it does regtest OK.
I didn't realise th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118033
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118039
Bug ID: 118039
Summary: [15 Regression] s390x/-m31: libsanitizer:
interception_type_test.cpp: static assertion failed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118040
Bug ID: 118040
Summary: GCC's Address Sanitizer misses
'global-buffer-overflow',while clang can detect it
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118039
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117725
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
*** Bug 118039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118040
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is about where Arr is placed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117897
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117959
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 118040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118040
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just happens the order of variables layout is different between GCC and clang.
Note I will note clang has 2 different layouts too, one for C and one for C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9)
--- snip ---
>
> The mention of binutils jogged my memory. I had a test failure that showed
> up randomly one time. It was related to class_transformational_2.f9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118042
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(insn 228 230 227 2 (set (reg:TI 345)
(subreg:TI (reg:HI 389) 0)) "/app/example.cpp":6:5 94 {*movti_internal}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:HI 389)
(nil)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043
--- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> /* The two specs designate different size arguments. It's okay
> for the explicit spec to specify a size where none is provided
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114087
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So just a couple notes.
The more Oliver and I discuss this BZ, the more I suspect the right place to
tackle these problems is either in the match.pd framework or at the gimple->rtl
expansion phase.
I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114087
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleCanonical:
(a | CST0) == CST1 or (a & CST2) == CST3 (where CST2 == ~CST0 and CST3 ==
CST1&~CST0 (PR 86975, related to PR 08) (LLVM chooses the &)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118032
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No, I'm not seeing this in my BPI bootstraps. My bootstrap + regression test
is sitting at 26-27hrs. It's been in that range since I turned bootstrapping
on back in mid Oct.
tware/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 15.0.0 20241214 (experimental) (GCC)
[611] %
[611] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[612] %
[612] % gcctk -O2 small.c
[613] % ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e343ef7f0ac0eb9e526b4f6d3bf3f69be3f0684
commit r15-6258-g3e343ef7f0ac0eb9e526b4f6d3bf3f69be3f0684
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118046
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-14
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118046
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
From:
```
// char _6;
// int _5;
_5 = *i.3_4;
_6 = (char) _5;
...
_8 = (int) _6;
if (_8 >= 0) // sign bit is not set
goto ; [59.00%]
else
goto ; [41.00%]
[local count: 220117072]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118046
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced down to just:
```
__attribute__((noipa))
int f(int *a,int *d)
{
signed char b = *a;
int c = b;
*d = c; // This store is important even if otherwise unused
if (c < 0 && (b&1))
return 1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118048
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I think r13-4467-g6d3c634c8baebd changed the behavior to be correct in
erroring out. Which means I think most LINK_SPECs were incorrect before and
was not noticed either.
Note aarch64 linux most likely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |documentation
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 118044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118044
--- Comment #2 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Hmmm, interesting. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118043
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > /* The two specs designate different size arguments. It's okay
> > for the explicit s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #9 from Andrew
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
Assignee: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
trunk 20241214 produced an underlinked libm2iso.so on x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #18 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch for the case of derived type dummies:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-December/061410.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Bug ID: 118047
Summary: Incorrect direct-initialization of vector of struct of
array of struct of enum
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect list |[12/13/14/15
|initial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59870|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59870
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59870&action=edit
unincluded version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118048
Bug ID: 118048
Summary: `-h`support does not work everywhere
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15|[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is a compile time testcase:
```
#include
enum E {
One
};
struct A {
E e = One;
};
struct B {
A as[1] {};
};
struct v
{
constexpr v(const std::initializer_list &a) : size(a.size()){}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118047
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> r12-7803-gf0530882d99abc
.. but that patch got backported to 11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117658
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
76 matches
Mail list logo
