https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94960
--- Comment #17 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15) > > Oh, sorry, that was linked earlier. But still, isn't the problem that > > "inline" > > is too strong? > Do we have some data on this? I at least don't have any. I could do comparisons with a large package list before/after although I don't have that scripted yet (nobody's asked before). But the user from dupe PR117550 seemed to say it had impacted their application badly...