https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94960

--- Comment #17 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15)
> > Oh, sorry, that was linked earlier. But still, isn't the problem that 
> > "inline"
> > is too strong?
> Do we have some data on this? 

I at least don't have any. I could do comparisons with a large package list
before/after although I don't have that scripted yet (nobody's asked before).

But the user from dupe PR117550 seemed to say it had impacted their application
badly...

Reply via email to