[Bug libfortran/117820] New: Formatted output gives wrong result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820 Bug ID: 117820 Summary: Formatted output gives wrong result. Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran

[Bug libfortran/117819] New: Formatted READ with BZ in format fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117819 Bug ID: 117819 Summary: Formatted READ with BZ in format fails Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortra

[Bug libfortran/117820] Formatted output gives wrong result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/117782] template ICE in write_unscoped_name while using autofda bootstrap on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782 --- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Can you try again now that PR 117350 has actually been pushed? Thanks. This fixes.

[Bug ipa/117782] template ICE in write_unscoped_name while using autofda bootstrap on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Andrew P

[Bug ipa/117350] [15 Regression] ICE with autoprofiledbootstrap and bootstrap-lto after r15-4610-gbf43fe6aa966ea

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117350 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/117757] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_gimplify_expr, at c-family/c-gimplify.cc:810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117757 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug c/117757] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_gimplify_expr, at c-family/c-gimplify.cc:810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117757 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c commit r15-5741-g24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c Author: Joseph Myers Date: Thu

[Bug c/115644] [gcc][trunk] ICE if redeclare a variable with different type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115644 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c commit r15-5741-g24dac1eab9c3b650826bbaa84dd64310910e647c Author: Joseph Myers Date: Thu

[Bug middle-end/117823] sdot_prod pattern extended to floating point?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117823 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao Liu --- The vectorization maybe need ffast-math.

[Bug middle-end/117823] New: sdot_prod pattern extended to floating point?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117823 Bug ID: 117823 Summary: sdot_prod pattern extended to floating point? Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug ipa/117824] New: ipa-modref isn't documented ingccint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117824 Bug ID: 117824 Summary: ipa-modref isn't documented ingccint Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/117810] Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 --- Comment #3 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Not sure what this has to do with constexpr, but allowing expressions should be possible. WG21 is working on contracts to specify pre-. and postprocessing, but I am not sure advanced this is. I

[Bug fortran/46532] [OMP] missing error for loop bounds missing an attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46532 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Target Milestone|-

[Bug ipa/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > I don't know what the C4 constructor is for, but we should probably export > it. Well I tried with -static-libstdc++ and it fails with that option too. So I a

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0 Target Milestone|--

[Bug fortran/97122] Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a MODULE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 97122, which changed state. Bug 97122 Summary: Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification part of a MODULE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/95215] [OMP] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95215 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug libstdc++/117650] __glibcxx_assert_fail should be marked __attribute__((cold))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117650 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/102275] Assumed rank, unlimited polymorphic pointer gives incorrect behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102275 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/100097] Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paal at levold dot net --- C

[Bug target/117818] vec_add incorrectly generates vadduwm for vector char const inputs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818 --- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe --- Same issues compiled for power9/10

[Bug ipa/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > I don't know what the C4 constructor is for, but we should probably export > it. So C4/C5 are internal and should always be inlined I think So maybe this is a

[Bug libstdc++/117655] std::string::swap() could be much faster and smaller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117655 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #2) > It looks like a similar optimization would make sense for > operator=(string&&): https://godbolt.org/z/Wo19fjKeK. I think this is missing the fix up, althoug

[Bug c/117178] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should ignore trailing NUL byte for nonstring char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 --- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to uecker from comment #17) > Fairly limited, but if you only have specific cases where you need > this, this worked for me as a workaround: > > #define TRUNC4(x) { x[0], x[1], x[2], x[3] } > stati

[Bug libstdc++/117650] __glibcxx_assert_fail should be marked __attribute__((cold))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117650 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17db5742a555d4f8fd5fa324adb6d1e5c55374be commit r15-5732-g17db5742a555d4f8fd5fa324adb6d1e5c55374be Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug middle-end/43374] ICE with __builtin_isinf() and _Decimal argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43374 --- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Janis Johnson from comment #4) > The tests also fail on powerpc64-linux, although the first one gets the same > error with and without optimization. > > elm3c105% cat 43374-1.c > int func(_Deci

[Bug c/91193] ICE on invalid: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (function_decl) in grokdeclarator, at c/c-decl.c:5956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||15.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/91193] ICE on invalid: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (function_decl) in grokdeclarator, at c/c-decl.c:5956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87492fb3fd5e7510983e0275a38ba95769335018 commit r15-5734-g87492fb3fd5e7510983e0275a38ba95769335018 Author: Joseph Myers Date: Wed

[Bug other/117815] RFE: provide a way to capture SARIF for all gcc invocations in a build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/117782] template ICE in write_unscoped_name while using autofda bootstrap on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117782 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug other/117815] New: RFE: provide a way to capture SARIF for all gcc invocations in a build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815 Bug ID: 117815 Summary: RFE: provide a way to capture SARIF for all gcc invocations in a build Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > You can get the desired behavior with -fno-signed-zeros I think - it might > be reasonable to add an additional -fcx-* flag specifying that just for

[Bug middle-end/112600] Failed to optimize saturating addition using __builtin_add_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600 --- Comment #29 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a8685911697c237ff8c0589827eb8649f8440f1 commit r15-5727-g4a8685911697c237ff8c0589827eb8649f8440f1 Author: Pan Li Date: Fri Nov 22 11:

[Bug target/117811] [ARM NEON] bad code for conditional right shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811 --- Comment #1 from Benoit Pierre --- Created attachment 59725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59725&action=edit Full output of: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -v -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-aliasing -O2 -mfpu=neon -S test.c -o -

[Bug ipa/117796] Accepting undefined symbols with -flto -O0 -ftoplevel-reorder -fipa-reference-addressable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117796 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Starke --- Thank you for the detailed explanation.

[Bug c/117781] typeof_unqual should not remove atomic from an array of atomic type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117781 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaa675ad3f0a033537440f93172a7b122c04cab5 commit r15-5725-geaa675ad3f0a033537440f93172a7b122c04cab5 Author: Joseph Myers Date: Wed

[Bug c/112841] typeof_unqual is not removing qualifiers from the element type of array types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112841 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaa675ad3f0a033537440f93172a7b122c04cab5 commit r15-5725-geaa675ad3f0a033537440f93172a7b122c04cab5 Author: Joseph Myers Date: Wed

[Bug c/117781] typeof_unqual should not remove atomic from an array of atomic type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117781 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/117210] [15 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'labs'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- Alternatively, we could just open code the conditions from sys/cdefs.h Both FreeBSD and DragonFlyBSD do: #if (__GNUC_PREREQ__(2, 0) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)) || \ __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901 #def

[Bug c/117810] New: Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 Bug ID: 117810 Summary: Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/111263] test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|powerpc64-linux-gnu,

[Bug target/117818] New: vec_add incorrectly generates vadduwm for vector char const inputs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818 Bug ID: 117818 Summary: vec_add incorrectly generates vadduwm for vector char const inputs. Product: gcc Version: 13.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/117178] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should ignore trailing NUL byte for nonstring char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug ipa/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/117818] vec_add incorrectly generates vadduwm for vector char const inputs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818 --- Comment #1 from Steven Munroe --- May be related to 117007

[Bug libstdc++/116212] [13/14/15 regression] -Walloc-size-larger-than warning when building 20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_move/constrained.cc with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah yes I see it on 14. The warning is nonsense, none of the vectors used have a length greater than 4, and the largest size is sizeof(std::string). 4 * 32 is not in the range [18446744071562067968, 1844674

[Bug c++/117788] [C++26] P2865R5 - Removing deprecated array comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117788 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Perhaps we can promote the warning to an error in C++26, and leave the rest of the changes for GCC 16.

[Bug libbacktrace/117812] zstd dependency 1.5.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/117817] [13 Regression] Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/36503] x86 can use x >> -y for x >> 32-y

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36503 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:093584abb854559393e36cd4cdcf9dc4862dd046 commit r15-5731-g093584abb854559393e36cd4cdcf9dc4862dd046 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Wed N

[Bug libstdc++/116212] [13/14/15 regression] -Walloc-size-larger-than warning when building 20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_move/constrained.cc with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- It looks fixed on trunk but I can hit it with 14 at least.

[Bug c/117178] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should ignore trailing NUL byte for nonstring char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 Paul Eggert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- Comment #16

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/tree-complex.cc b/gcc/tree-complex.cc index 7480c07640e..69786661a78 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-complex.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-complex.cc @@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ some_nonzerop (tree t) /* Operations w

[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libbacktrace/117812] zstd dependency 1.5.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/117791] Segmentation fault when using -fcheck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117791 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to fail|

[Bug c/117810] Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #5 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk --- Compiling with -fno-signed-zeros does work surprisingly well. I say "surprisingly", as I think that the change affects more than just signed zeros, in that 3.0*(2.0,Inf) might be (6.0,Inf) or (NaN,I

[Bug c++/117788] [C++26] P2865R5 - Removing deprecated array comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117788 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is very much possible it actually is that simple, the overloaded operator behavior is described elsewhere - https://eel.is/c++draft/class.compare so maybe what is written there isn't affected by wording c

[Bug libbacktrace/117812] New: zstd dependency 1.5.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117812 Bug ID: 117812 Summary: zstd dependency 1.5.1 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libbacktrace Ass

[Bug target/117814] New: arm/MVE: regressions after r15-4734-g63b6967b06b538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117814 Bug ID: 117814 Summary: arm/MVE: regressions after r15-4734-g63b6967b06b538 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/117814] arm/MVE: regressions after r15-4734-g63b6967b06b538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117814 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0e962ea18667bc3cdabcafef85b241a4f2c678 commit r12-10836-gdc0e962ea18667bc3cdabcafef85b241a4f2c678 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug c/117745] [12/13/14/15 Regression] GCC hangs with invalid code with sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117745 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:958f0025f41d8bd9812e4da91a72b1ad79496e5b commit r15-5728-g958f0025f41d8bd9812e4da91a72b1ad79496e5b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug c/117745] [12/13/14 Regression] GCC hangs with invalid code with sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117745 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] GCC

[Bug c++/117817] New: Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817 Bug ID: 117817 Summary: Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug ipa/117813] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |ipa --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/117817] [13 Regression] Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/117811] [12/13/14/15 Regression] bad code for conditional right shift with autovec and neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug c/117724] [15 regression] ICE when building libgit2 (error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ is not compatible)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117724 --- Comment #8 from Andres Freund --- FWIW, a few of postgres' CI instances (which intentionally track a snapshot gcc) are hitting this (see e.g. [1]). I reproduced the failure locally, applied the patch from [2], after which the build succeeds.

[Bug fortran/117798] Audit intrinsic subprograms with scalar INTENT(OUT) character strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117798 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also|

[Bug target/117811] [12/13/14/15 Regression] bad code for conditional right shift with autovec and neon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/117797] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117797 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last rec

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 117776, which changed state. Bug 117776 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization/vectorization opportunity (adding a even/odd check to an accumulator) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117776

[Bug tree-optimization/117776] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization/vectorization opportunity (adding a even/odd check to an accumulator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.5|15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c/91193] ICE on invalid: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (function_decl) in grokdeclarator, at c/c-decl.c:5956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/117809] feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117809 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/117810] Feature request: attribute access but for (start, end) type interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117810 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/91193] ICE on invalid: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (function_decl) in grokdeclarator, at c/c-decl.c:5956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xieym3 at zohomail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/117358] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2138 at -O2 and above with const attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117358 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/117105] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117105 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/117776] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization/vectorization opportunity (adding a even/odd check to an accumulator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117776 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bca515ff1893fe4ca1a9042364af3c43f93a397c commit r15-5730-gbca515ff1893fe4ca1a9042364af3c43f93a397c Author: Andrew Pinski Date: M

[Bug c/117806] ICE: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117806 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- gcc_checking_assert (!TYPE_NAME (n) || comptypes (n, t1)); gcc_checking_assert (!TYPE_NAME (n) || comptypes (n, t2)); It is the first one that is failing.

[Bug ada/117808] New: Internal compiler error when using Ada 'Image attribute for record (-gnat2022)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117808 Bug ID: 117808 Summary: Internal compiler error when using Ada 'Image attribute for record (-gnat2022) Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c/117809] New: feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117809 Bug ID: 117809 Summary: feature request: attribute malloc but for non-function-return-value return values Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- You can get the desired behavior with -fno-signed-zeros I think - it might be reasonable to add an additional -fcx-* flag specifying that just for _Complex operations signed zeros can be ignored (IIRC non-c

[Bug target/117811] New: [ARM NEON] bad code for conditional right shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811 Bug ID: 117811 Summary: [ARM NEON] bad code for conditional right shift Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/117806] ICE: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117806 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 59729 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59729&action=edit Reduced testcase This reduced testcase has no errors and is valid C23 as far as I can tell.

[Bug c/117806] [14/15 Regression] ICE: in composite_type_internal with C23 tag compatibility and packed/aligned attribute on a field (defined 3 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117806 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE: in

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #2 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk --- There will certainly be differences in some cases. If R=2.0 and Z=-0.0i the answer might be (0.0,0.0) or (0.0,-0.0). The point is that Fortran does not specify which of these is correct. Both are re

[Bug c/117750] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (function_decl) in grokdeclarator, at c/c-decl.cc:6981

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117750 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/117816] New: ICE: in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.cc:2837: flow control insn inside a basic block with -O -favoid-store-forwarding -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-forward-propagate

fix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20241127062712-r15-5717-g32f6485849c826-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20241127 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/84211] [avr] Perform a post-reload register optimization pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84211 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/117813] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/117813] New: GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Bug ID: 117813 Summary: GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0

[Bug c/117802] ICE: SIGSEGV in fold_convert_loc (fold-const.cc:2626) with __builtin_iseqsig() on _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

  1   2   >