https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Reverting r15-4402 and r15-4377 per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190#c3 works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117186
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> With the following test case I can reproduce the wrong-code with gcc-10.5
> and newer, but not with gcc-9.5/8.5/7.5.
>
Yes on aarch64, it started in gcc 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44a81aaf73f795e6992cbfb98ec48480e5ca94ec
commit r15-4483-g44a81aaf73f795e6992cbfb98ec48480e5ca94ec
Author: John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114817
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a12ac403251e0a1542609d7a4d8a464a5e1dc86
commit r15-4479-g3a12ac403251e0a1542609d7a4d8a464a5e1dc86
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210
Vedran Miletic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||developer@lorenzosalvadore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104547
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually, maybe not.
CI was failing for an earlier iteration of r15-4473-g3abe751ea86e34 but the
final version I pushed seems to be optimized well by vrp2. False alarm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117192
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117211
Bug ID: 117211
Summary: Building gcc configured with --enable-coverage=opt
fails with a link error after r15-4286-gc397a8c12296b7
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117212
Bug ID: 117212
Summary: ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3059
Product: gcc
Version: 12.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117215
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
python ./nagisa/tools/create_link/main.py ./nagisa/include/nagisa ./nagisa/libs
File "./nagisa/tools/create_link/main.py", line 34
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xe7' in file
./nagisa/tools/create_link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117215
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh that is because for me python is python 2 still while python3 is the version
needed ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117215
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note you can use -H to debug what headers are being included when ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117215
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||1300296933 at qq dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117204
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117190
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Another option would be to revert r15-4402 and r15-4377 and reapply once
> this fix is tested and approved.
Given 2 other PRs and these reverts help all known issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
Bug ID: 117208
Summary: Miscompilation at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|gcc.target/pow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
Hi there,
We are excited to offer you a comprehensive email list of school districts that
includes key contact information such as phone numbers, email addresses,
mailing addresses, company revenue, size, and web addresses. Our databases also
cover related industries such as:
* K-12 schools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102365
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #405 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
File too large to be attached, so uploading it here:
https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/pr-55212-404.tgz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117218
--- Comment #1 from Yibo He ---
There is a small mistake in the above comment (code command). Update:
$riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc -march=rv64gcv_zvfh -mabi=lp64d -Wno-psabi -static -O
1.c -o a.out && qemu-riscv64 a.out
$0 0 0 a4c26086 c84e12fd
$ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117219
Bug ID: 117219
Summary: strict aliasing documentation maybe should mention
C++20's std::bitcast
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: docume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #19 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #15)
> > While bootstrap is okay, there are some new test fails:
> >
> > AIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr926
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Bettis ---
Created attachment 59389
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59389&action=edit
Don't decrement the highest_location if that would move to a different ordinary
map
This attached patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Needs -fstack-protector.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104547
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This testcase now fails, because _M_default_append is not removed by vrp2. The
body of resize does get optimized pretty well by some later pass. But the
_M_default_append definition remains in the asm eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin ---
While bootstrap is okay, there are some new test fails:
AIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92618.c -O1 (internal compiler error: maximum
number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90))
FAIL: gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117215
Bug ID: 117215
Summary: The preprocessor may fail to replace #include
statements under certain conditions.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bic60176 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #13)
> The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44a81aaf73f795e6992cbfb98ec48480e5ca94ec
>
> commit r15-4483-g44a81a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin ---
For test LRA, it is probably easiest to change the "Init(0)" in
the mlra option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115242
--- Comment #5 from Alisa Sireneva ---
Sorry for spam, just wanted to add some more context and maybe take back some
of my conclusions. This has gotten more offtopic than I expected, so please
tell me if I need to file another bug.
According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #19)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17)
> > (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #15)
> > > While bootstrap is okay, there are some n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117206
Bug ID: 117206
Summary: Remnants of Sphinx-generated web pages
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117207
--- Comment #1 from Jeevitha ---
In pr103515.c, we have two functions: foo1 and foo2. We have the #pragma GCC
optimize("O3,unroll-loops") directive for foo2. In the test suite, the
following checks are performed:
"The pragma specified for foo2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #15)
> While bootstrap is okay, there are some new test fails:
>
> AIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92618.c -O1 (internal compiler error:
> maximum number of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117214
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We should probably just use std::time_put
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217
Bug ID: 117217
Summary: ICE in tree-sra when copying struct with a union of
packed structs with bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117218
Bug ID: 117218
Summary: Miscompilation: A possible miscompilation triggered by
the `__riscv_vcreate_v_u32m1x2` RVV intrinsic in GCC
14
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in tree-sra when|[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. ---
This ICEs on trunk without [[gnu::packed]]:
struct a {
int b;
long c;
long d;
bool f;
};
struct g {
int b;
long c;
long d;
bool : 1;
} h;
struct l {
union i {
a j;
g k;
i(g m) : k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117216
Bug ID: 117216
Summary: wrong sign for complex sqrt(-x-i0) (for targets
without C99 math)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117209
Bug ID: 117209
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed with asan.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117176
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Have added more lowering to gcond handling and now we vectorize this as well:
ptrue p7.b, all
fmovz30.d, #1.0e+0
ld1dz31.d, p7/z, [sp, #1, mul vl]
fcmlt p15.d,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210
Bug ID: 117210
Summary: [15.0 regression] error: 'llabs' is not a member of
'std'; did you mean 'labs'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-freebsd
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117208
--- Comment #6 from Jiajing_Zheng ---
I see. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers ---
On the whole I'd expect vector initializers to work like structure ones: that a
vector can be initialized either with another vector of the same type, or with
brace-enclosed scalars, and that inside a brac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117214
Bug ID: 117214
Summary: chrono format error for time point using %c: D_T_FMT
cannot be directly used as chrono-specs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117213
Bug ID: 117213
Summary: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn
achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115815
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f057e958732cd2627b6db127fa6d4d882b61dd5f
commit r14-10803-gf057e958732cd2627b6db127fa6d4d882b61dd5f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117204
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
0x555 is 0x7fff/(3*8) . 0x7fff is the max
size for pointers in 64bit.
So there is no uninitialized value here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||overseers at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the pattern that GCC's (internal) memory alloctor uses is 0xaf and 0xa5.
0xaf is for the initial value and 0xa5 is after it gets freed. But this is only
with checking enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117211
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Building gcc configured |[15 regression] Building
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117211
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Can you still reproduce this after r15-4345-g384faebde257b0?
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #0)
> Starting with commit r15-4286-gc397a8c12296b7 (Jakub Jelinek:
> libcpp, genmatch: Use gcc_diag instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846
--- Comment #32 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
commit r15-4473-g3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
commit r15-4473-g3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ed561f63e7955df4d194669998176df5ef47803
commit r15-4475-g7ed561f63e7955df4d194669998176df5ef47803
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114817
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ed561f63e7955df4d194669998176df5ef47803
commit r15-4475-g7ed561f63e7955df4d194669998176df5ef47803
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #53 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
commit r15-4473-g3abe751ea86e3472fa2c97bf2014f9f93f569019
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117212
--- Comment #1 from Bi6c ---
We have found crashes on gcc-11.5.0, gcc-12.4.0, and gcc-13.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117221
Bug ID: 117221
Summary: Add smoketest for alternative compiler for libstdc++
headers (like CXX_UNDER_TEST)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> I sort of wonder if we should have some smoketest in the testsuite where we
> just try include every header with Clang optionally. I don't test Clang much
> and only hit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117221
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Tangentially: I don't know if we should consider running the whole testsuite
under Clang for this, if anybody's tried that before, or what.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117222
Bug ID: 117222
Summary: [15 regression] Missed optimization with with
std::vector resize in loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: misse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #404 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I have run into another ICE with WebKit when using Oleg's tree:
/usr/bin/g++-15 -DBUILDING_GTK__=1 -DBUILDING_WEBKIT=1 -DBUILDING_WITH_CMAKE=1
-DBUILDING_WebCore -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=\"WebKitGTK-4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117210
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15.0 regression] error:|[15 regression] error:
|'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117219
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-19
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
$ clang++ xray_buffer_queue.ii
In file included from
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-18.1.8-r1/work/compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_buffer_queue.cpp:23:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 59390
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59390&action=edit
xray_buffer_queue.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
g++ builds xray_buffer_queue.cpp fine though..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
`#include ` is enough to break it with Clang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I sort of wonder if we should have some smoketest in the testsuite where we
just try include every header with Clang optionally. I don't test Clang much
and only hit this because our compiler-rt-sanitizers packa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117220
Bug ID: 117220
Summary: [15 regression] compiler-rt-18.1.8 fails to build
(stl_iterator.h:1080:42: error: an attribute list
cannot appear here)
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117197
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
struct b {
__attribute__((vector_size(4))) int a;
};
int c;
void d() { struct b e = {0, 1, 2, 3}; }
shows
t.c: In function ‘d’:
t.c:5:29: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
5 | void d()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, andi at firstfloor dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117091
>
> --- Comment #15 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
> An upper limit has the pro
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
