[Bug c/107942] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Documentation of the volatile style for noreturn is gone and const style for const attribute is gone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107942 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.5|14.0

[Bug c/116767] C const function pointer no code generated (or optimized out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116767 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This extension is documented: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/Const-and-Volatile-Functions.html

[Bug tree-optimization/116768] [12/13/14/15 regression] Strict aliasing breaks autovectorization with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116768 Alisa Sireneva changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|11.4.0 |11.1.0 --- Comment #4 from Alisa Siren

[Bug libstdc++/116755] format and print functions prepend extra minus sign for min value of chrono duration type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116755 --- Comment #13 from Zartaj Majeed --- Got it - compiler is latest package for Ubuntu 24.04 - I too wish they'd keep up

[Bug tree-optimization/116766] Missed loop vectorization case with gather/scatter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Severity|normal

[Bug c/116767] C const function pointer no code generated (or optimized out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116767 --- Comment #7 from Martin Uecker --- I wonder whether there should be a warning when a declaration has the "const" attribute, but the actual definition does not.

[Bug c++/116770] Diagnostic 'explicit qualification in declaration of' could be clearer when explicit namespace qualifier matches the open namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116770 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- DR482

[Bug libstdc++/114101] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++17.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114101 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57529|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/116770] Diagnostic 'explicit qualification in declaration of' could be clearer when explicit namespace qualifier matches the open namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116770 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/116769] Instantiation of defaulted default constructor with non default constructible NDSMIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #2) > > * rejects the code due to the default constructor being invalid. > > That would be Clang? Yes sorry I forgot to mark it as such.

[Bug c++/116756] ICE from expand_expr_real_1 with recursive lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116756 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/116769] Instantiation of defaulted default constructor with non default constructible NDSMIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769 --- Comment #2 from Giuseppe D'Angelo --- > * rejects the code due to the default constructor being invalid. That would be Clang?

[Bug c/116357] [12/13/14/15 Regression] The item's address of the array is not correct if aligned is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116357 --- Comment #6 from Alwin Zhang --- Thank you Richard for your detailed elaboration.

[Bug target/113936] Switch c6x to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113936 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113937] Switch fr30 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113937 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113945] Switch visium to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113945 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113944] Switch rl78 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113944 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-09-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113933] Switch pa to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113933 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113948] Switch rx to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113948 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113941] Switch mn10300 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113941 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113942] Switch msp430 to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113942 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113943] Switch m32c to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113943 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/113948] Switch rx to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113948 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org, |

[Bug target/113954] Finish LRA transition for arc by removing -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113954 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Indeed. I'm mostly interested in that being fixed in case people are using it as a safety blanket for unreported issues, or if there's some cleanups they're putting off doing.

<    1   2   3