https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail dot com> --- > * rejects the code due to the default constructor being invalid. That would be Clang?
dangelog at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:28:40 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail dot com> --- > * rejects the code due to the default constructor being invalid. That would be Clang?