https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116769

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #2)
> > * rejects the code due to the default constructor being invalid.
> 
> That would be Clang?

Yes sorry I forgot to mark it as such.

Reply via email to