[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #49 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #48) > It's your (1). gcc is changing a program that can rely on errno not being > changed to one where the C library can change it. (The current C library or > any fu

[Bug middle-end/113082] New: builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 Bug ID: 113082 Summary: builtin transforms do not honor errno Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-e

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-19 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Joseph - I wonder if the standard folks can be convinced to amend most > library function documentation as to not altering 'errno' (like memcpy, > strlen, etc.

[Bug libfortran/110651] libgfortran.spec links twice with libgcc spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110651 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCO

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #14 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > Does it work correctly without valgrind? Yes. No one has yet attempted to reproduce my results. vld1q_u8 is a 128 bit ARM hardware instruction. I assume tha

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #51 from David Brown --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #48) > It's your (1). gcc is changing a program that can rely on errno not being > changed to one where the C library can change it. (The current C library or > any futur

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #15 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12) > Because otherwise I'm going to get blamed for every bug older than > 2022-11-01! > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111270#c1 My apologies for

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 > > --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)

[Bug target/113070] [14 regression] [AArch64] [PGO/LTO] Miscompilation of go compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/113073] [14] RISC-V: segfault from out of bounds memory access in gcc.dg/torture/pr112736.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113076] [14] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90 runtime error after r14-4971-g0beb1611754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv --- Comment #1 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/113078] [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113079] [x86] Fails to generate dot_prod instructions for 64-bit vector.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113079 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/113064] assignement from temporary sometimes invokes copy-assign instead of move-assign operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113064 --- Comment #4 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- This also might be a just another symptom of the same root cause: struct bar { bar() = default; bar(const bar&); bar(bar&&); bar& operator=(const bar&); bar& operator=(bar&

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Not sheer fluke, it was the same ^d4ba3b369c commit both times, because that was the oldest commit in your clone.

[Bug target/113061] [14 Regression][aarch64] ICE in lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value, at lra.cc:192 since r14-6605-gc0911c6b357ba9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113061 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cd55480857bf310c9be7daea39ea266772d3666 commit r14-6678-g2cd55480857bf310c9be7daea39ea266772d3666 Author: Alex Coplan Date: Tue D

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80e1375ed7a7a05a5a60a57e72c5ad5eba005798 commit r14-6679-g80e1375ed7a7a05a5a60a57e72c5ad5eba005798 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/113061] [14 Regression][aarch64] ICE in lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value, at lra.cc:192 since r14-6605-gc0911c6b357ba9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113061 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113062] [14 Regression][aarch64] ICE in fuse_pair, at config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc:1456 since r14-6605-gc0911c6b357ba9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113062 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5) > The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : Can this patch be backported to gcc-13 branch?

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf251fba0f0a374225a81021af5ec6c6ccceb5b commit r13-8167-g0cf251fba0f0a374225a81021af5ec6c6ccceb5b Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08a9df82bc2958df1c5508a0352d31a29c0ebe74 commit r12-10061-g08a9df82bc2958df1c5508a0352d31a29c0ebe74 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/113077] [14 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset with `-O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 --- Comment #20 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9b7e78dae13945dd9b296f2cca67650da0f869d commit r11-11159-gd9b7e78dae13945dd9b296f2cca67650da0f869d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/112816] [11/12 Regression] ICE unrecognizable_insn with __builtin_signbit and returning struct with int[4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112816 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113080] Missed optimization of loop invariant elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5) > > The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : > > Can this patch be backported to gcc-13 branch? Sure - I

[Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06ffe577036fa58968960afc62e16349fa43d496 commit r13-8168-g06ffe577036fa58968960afc62e16349fa43d496 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/90868] Duplicate OpenACC 'declare' directives for `extern` variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90868 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf840a7f7c14242ab7018071310851486a557d4f commit r14-6681-gcf840a7f7c14242ab7018071310851486a557d4f Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug c++/113064] assignement from temporary sometimes invokes copy-assign instead of move-assign operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113064 --- Comment #5 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- (In reply to m.cencora from comment #4) > This also might be a just another symptom of the same root cause: This one is actually a regression (worked on gcc 8.3 and older)

[Bug target/113083] New: [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

master --target=arm-linux-gnueabi --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --disable-libsanitizer --enable-checking Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20231219 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/113040] [14 Regression] libmvec test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113040 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/113080] Missed optimization of loop invariant elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113080 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afd49e663258061a10f0f2c4a8f8aa2bf97bee42 commit r14-6684-gafd49e663258061a10f0f2c4a8f8aa2bf97bee42 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/113073] [14] RISC-V: segfault from out of bounds memory access in gcc.dg/torture/pr112736.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113073 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa2a48984c3d8c7a6a6da10d924e030b141b44cd commit r14-6683-gaa2a48984c3d8c7a6a6da10d924e030b141b44cd Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/113073] [14] RISC-V: segfault from out of bounds memory access in gcc.dg/torture/pr112736.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113080] Missed optimization of loop invariant elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/113070] [14 regression] [AArch64] [PGO/LTO] Miscompilation of go compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #17 from Mark Wielaard --- I am surprised valgrind memcheck doesn't produce more output, normally it would tell you why & where it found the address invalid. I assume somehow valgrind memcheck believes it is reading past the end of a

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug target/113076] [14] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90 runtime error after r14-4972-g8aa47713701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113076 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14] RISC-V:|[14] RISC-V: |gfortran.dg/

[Bug c++/113064] assignement from temporary sometimes invokes copy-assign instead of move-assign operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113064 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to m.cencora from comment #4) > This also might be a just another symptom of the same root cause: > > struct bar > { > bar() = default; > > bar(const bar&); > bar(bar&&); > > bar

[Bug target/113084] New: aarch64: vget_low blocks tail-call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113084 Bug ID: 113084 Summary: aarch64: vget_low blocks tail-call Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/113070] [14 regression] [AArch64] [PGO/LTO] Miscompilation of go compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/90679] Template specialization with const: “ambiguous template instantiation” error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90679 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d27ee7fcc3e31c2142124027dc87e5a0288c9ab commit r14-6714-g6d27ee7fcc3e31c2142124027dc87e5a0288c9ab Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/90679] Template specialization with const: “ambiguous template instantiation” error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90679 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a37463758dabc9647fa3d675dffdf43a737035d commit r14-6715-g0a37463758dabc9647fa3d675dffdf43a737035d Author: Patrick Palka Date: Tu

[Bug c++/90679] Template specialization with const: “ambiguous template instantiation” error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90679 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #18 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #17) > I am surprised valgrind memcheck doesn't produce more output, normally it > would tell you why & where it found the address invalid. The valgrind output I

[Bug middle-end/113084] aarch64: vget_low blocks tail-call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113084 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/113084] aarch64: vget_low blocks tail-call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113084 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/104820] mips: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.cc:407 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -mips4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104820 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #19 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #18) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #17) > > I am surprised valgrind memcheck doesn't produce more output, normally it > > would tell you why & where it

[Bug middle-end/113084] aarch64: vget_low blocks tail-call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113084 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug testsuite/113085] New: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113085 Bug ID: 113085 Summary: New test case libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c from r14-6499-g348874f0baac0f fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/104820] mips: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.cc:407 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -mips4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104820 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to matoro from comment #1) > This also seems to affect ia64 I think: IA64 is most likely a different issue, BImode used there. I would file it as a seperate bug.

[Bug target/113040] [14 Regression] libmvec test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113040 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113086] New: m68k: ICE at emit-rtl.cc:2287 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -fPIE compiling openssh 9.6p1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113086 Bug ID: 113086 Summary: m68k: ICE at emit-rtl.cc:2287 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -fPIE compiling openssh 9.6p1 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Statu

[Bug d/113081] static linking does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113081 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-19 Keywords|

[Bug debug/111735] incorrect BTF representation of forward-declared enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111735 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Faust : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1502d724df85163b14b04e8f67072ca88eac411d commit r14-6716-g1502d724df85163b14b04e8f67072ca88eac411d Author: David Faust Date: Tue D

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think it would be reasonable for glibc to require that audit modules don't change errno, at least when acting for libc function calls where glibc guarantees not changing errno. I think

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58055] [meta-bug] RVO / NRVO improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055 Bug 58055 depends on bug 51571, which changed state. Bug 51571 Summary: No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/108975] [11 Regression] ICE on constexpr variable used as nontype template since r9-5473-ge32fc4499f863f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Tar

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 --- Comment #20 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #19) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #18) > > (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #17) > > > Just a ping: it would be nice if this could be fixed, I'm

[Bug c++/108975] [11 Regression] ICE on constexpr variable used as nontype template since r9-5473-ge32fc4499f863f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975 --- Comment #20 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #19) > Patrick, do you want to backport your patch? Sure, will do

[Bug c++/106213] -Werror=deprecated-copy-dtor does not trigger warning and error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106213 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/58487] Missed return value optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug c++/58055] [meta-bug] RVO / NRVO improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055 Bug 58055 depends on bug 58487, which changed state. Bug 58487 Summary: Missed return value optimization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/88136] -Wdeprecated-copy is draconian and shouldn't be in -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88136 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/94264] Array-to-pointer conversion not performed on array prvalues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94264 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/102420] null pointer dereference during constant evaluation not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102420 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ba949c096f5250aa4efb94fb7c94d1304c1bf39 commit r14-6722-g5ba949c096f5250aa4efb94fb7c94d1304c1bf39 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/113063] Strange linker error in special case involving local class with defaulted spaceship operator and static assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113063 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fced59166f95e9922a72392955e4fed095afd47e commit r14-6724-gfced59166f95e9922a72392955e4fed095afd47e Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/113063] Strange linker error in special case involving local class with defaulted spaceship operator and static assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113063 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/108099] [12 Regression] ICE with type alias with `signed __int128_t`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106371] Bogus narrowing conversion reported due to bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106371 Lénárd Szolnoki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leni536 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/97219] [11 Regression] Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Previously we had: { return A::A (this); } now: { return *this = {}; }

[Bug tree-optimization/113069] gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc:143:12: warning: private field 'curr_generation' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113087] New: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 Bug ID: 113087 Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong --- Is this coming from SPEC 527 or 549 ?

[Bug c++/113047] dereferencing a null pointer in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113047 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathanieloshead at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #2 from Patrick O'Neill --- No, this is from a random generator but the 527/549 issues could be related? I haven't reduced spec fails.

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong --- (In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #2) > No, this is from a random generator but the 527/549 issues could be related? > I haven't reduced spec fails. I can't reproduce spec fails. We have tested it on b

[Bug tree-optimization/113069] gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc:143:12: warning: private field 'curr_generation' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113069 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40337cae12051336626d39500485cfc488c9c26e commit r14-6725-g40337cae12051336626d39500485cfc488c9c26e Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/113069] gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc:143:12: warning: private field 'curr_generation' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113088] New: Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088 Bug ID: 113088 Summary: Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113087] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch with rv64gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113087 --- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill --- I can attempt to reduce them however running an iteration of 549 takes multiple hours so it might be challenging using my current setup (creduce). Hopefully the random generator stumbles across the same is

[Bug middle-end/112938] ice with -fstrub=internal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112938 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/113088] [12/13/14 Regression] Segmentation fault with empty try/catch following try/catch with returns + noexcept destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113088 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/113012] [13/14 regression] ICE when building xorg-server with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:576c1fc4401a9dae9757ac2e4fa37d05e130fa3d commit r14-6730-g576c1fc4401a9dae9757ac2e4fa37d05e130fa3d Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar

[Bug rtl-optimization/113002] ICE in commit_one_edge_insertion, at cfgrtl.cc:2095 with new -finline-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113002 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108975] [11 Regression] ICE on constexpr variable used as nontype template since r9-5473-ge32fc4499f863f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975 --- Comment #21 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c563e5d6c5177bedf0dd8fc410f390bb3ec37183 commit r13-8170-gc563e5d6c5177bedf0dd8fc410f390bb3ec37183 Author: Patrick Palka

  1   2   >