https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70467
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 1 16:08:21 2016
New Revision: 234679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70467
* config/i386/i386.md (*add3_dou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Ok, sounds good. I have vacation this afternoon, but will revisit this over
the weekend or Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I understand the issues around heuristics.
Presumably this is the code which identifies cases where we have a single use
register with an associated REG_EQUIV note and we move the insn that sets the
equival
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70474
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Does this patch fix the problem?
>
> From preliminary tests, yes. Thanks for the prompt answer.
Confirmed after a clean bootstrap, results with the patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70482
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Richard,
The problem is in pattern matching:
/* Pattern detected. */
if (dump_enabled_p ())
dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
"vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern: detected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #8)
> I understand the issues around heuristics.
>
> Presumably this is the code which identifies cases where we have a single
> use register with an associated RE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68236
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Apr 1 17:35:12 2016
New Revision: 234680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline r230088
2015-11-10 Kyrylo Tkach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70505
Bug ID: 70505
Summary: Constexpr failure when template type specified
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70506
Bug ID: 70506
Summary: [CilkPlus] error: location references block not in
block tree
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Seems rather hackish to start accepting non-Pmode for the address. Though
looking at the docs, I guess it's not strictly incorrect.
The @code{symbol_ref} contains a mode, which is usually @code{Pmode}.
Usu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #50 from François Dumont ---
This performance issue is a result of fixing:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975
It resulted in many more modulo operations and so expensive float divisions.
I plan to commit an alternat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Bug ID: 70507
Summary: integer overflow builtins not constant expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68120
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I raised c++/70507 to make a record of another problem caused by the built-ins
not being treated as constant expressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470
--- Comment #23 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22)
> This seems to be fixed; the only subdir that fails to distclean properly for
> me currently is libcc1...
...which is Bug 70173
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70508
Bug ID: 70508
Summary: libstdc++.*-gdb.py': No such file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70509
Bug ID: 70509
Summary: wrong code with extract from a casted vector(64)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70510
Bug ID: 70510
Summary: ICE: output_operand: invalid %-code with -mavx512bw
-masm=intel when emitting vpbroatcast
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70509
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 38161
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38161&action=edit
reduced testcase, without casts
Output:
$ sde64 -- ./a.out
0009
Aborted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70511
Bug ID: 70511
Summary: tuple constructor from elements hides copy constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70364
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Apr 2 00:18:41 2016
New Revision: 234692
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234692&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing ChangeLog entry for PR testsuite/70364
Modified:
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70439
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Apr 2 00:24:44 2016
New Revision: 234693
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234693&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing ChangeLog entry for PR target/70439
Modified:
trun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70364
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70336
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70378
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-w64-mingw32 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70449
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 2 01:35:45 2016
New Revision: 234695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70449
PR c++/70344
* pt.c (instantiate_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70344
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 2 01:35:45 2016
New Revision: 234695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70449
PR c++/70344
* pt.c (instantiate_dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70449
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160401 (experimental) [trunk revision 234665] (GCC)
$
$ g++-5.3 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In member function ‘S& S::operator=(int)’:
small.cpp:5:13: internal compiler error: canon
++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160401 (experimental) [trunk revision 234665] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp:4:29: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
enum D::Color { R, G, B } c
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
