https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70474
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > > Does this patch fix the problem? > > From preliminary tests, yes. Thanks for the prompt answer. Confirmed after a clean bootstrap, results with the patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-04/msg00055.html Note that the patch --- /opt/gcc/4.9_clean/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c 2014-04-21 11:20:11.000000000 +0200 +++ /opt/gcc/4.9_work/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c 2015-10-22 17:01:49.000000000 +0200 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ int main() { } /* { dg-output "heap-use-after-free.*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ -/* { dg-output " #0 \[^\n\r]*(in _*(interceptor_|)free|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ +/* { dg-output " #0 \[^\n\r]*(in _*(interceptor_|wrap_)free|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ /* { dg-output " #1 \[^\n\r]*(in _*main (\[^\n\r]*sanity-check-pure-c-1.c:8|\[^\n\r]*:0)|\[(\]).*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ -/* { dg-output " #0 \[^\n\r]*(in _*(interceptor_|)malloc|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ +/* { dg-output " #0 \[^\n\r]*(in _*(interceptor_|wrap_)malloc|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ /* { dg-output " #1 \[^\n\r]*(in _*main (\[^\n\r]*sanity-check-pure-c-1.c:7|\[^\n\r]*:0)|\[(\])\[^\n\r]*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */ should be applied to the gcc-4.9 and gcc-5 branches (it has already been applied to trunk).
