https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Bug ID: 67756
Summary: ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 36411
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36411&action=edit
preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> There are some improvements with LRA, but the regression in teem-1.6.0-src
>
> total: 1105728 -> 1122288+16560 / +1.497656 %
>
> outweighs all of the i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742
>
> --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49367
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48390
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67757
Bug ID: 67757
Summary: ICE after "ambiguous reference"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|ICE compiling Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Sep 29 09:32:40 2015
New Revision: 228231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65105
* config/i386/i386.c: Include db
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
Bug ID: 67758
Summary: [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Thanks for the patch. I have just tested it, and it indeed fixes the issue from
the testcase. I am currently trying to build ffmpeg, from which the testcase
has been extracted to see if all the issues are re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759
Bug ID: 67759
Summary: Missing warning "makes pointer from integer without a
cast" after multiline assert
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I believe that when we see this in testcase.c.232r.reload
73: [r166:SI++]=r142:SI#0
REG_DEAD r142:SI
REG_INC r149:SI
Inserting insn reload before:
153: r166:SI=[afp:SI+0x14f8]
Inser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67760
Bug ID: 67760
Summary: ICE on contained subroutine in function modifying
function return value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Proposed patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg02186.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno ---
The ffmpeg testsuite is successful on mips64el-linux-gnu with this patch
applied.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761
Bug ID: 67761
Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672
zmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from zmi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Assignee|una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
Bug ID: 67762
Summary: [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65393
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 29 12:54:05 2015
New Revision: 228242
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228242&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reduce space and time overhead of std::thread
PR libstdc++/65393
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65393
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672
--- Comment #14 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, it does, but the fix is due to its size only available on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 29 13:02:42 2015
New Revision: 228243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/67741
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 29 13:04:18 2015
New Revision: 228244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/67170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67652
iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67763
Bug ID: 67763
Summary: [SH] Redirect conditional branches
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67764
Bug ID: 67764
Summary: -Wconversion generates false warnings for bitmask+cast
expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67583
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Sep 29 13:31:51 2015
New Revision: 228245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228245&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67583 Fix invalid sputn calls in tests
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67583
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716
--- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #16)
> > Regardless of those, Kaz, can you please commit attachment 36397 [details]?
> > Then I can handle the other cases on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67698
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552
Bug 67552 depends on bug 67698, which changed state.
Bug 67698 Summary: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2297
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67698
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67765
Bug ID: 67765
Summary: [SH] Improve treg_combine pass
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766
Bug ID: 67766
Summary: [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu:
ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The compile-time error goes away when adding
-fno-sanitize=null,returns-nonnull-attribute,nonnull-attribute to the
command-line options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Not reducing anymore; creduce dies for me :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #117 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #94)
> Kaz, do you think we can enable LRA by default for GCC 6?
>
> Some early results from the AMS optimization show new R0 spill failures.
> For example, AMS uses @(R0,R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Not reducing anymore; creduce dies for me :(.
Yes, I was unsuccessful in reducing it with creduce, too.
(Well, clang doesn't support C++ concepts yet, so p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Hm, those addressing mode issues are supposed to be improved by the AMS pass.
But it's not ready yet.
Compiling CSiBE with the current AMS branch, without LRA:
sum: 879 -> 3318319-15560 / -0.466724 %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767
Bug ID: 67767
Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn suggests noreturn for
function which already has noreturn and cold.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767
--- Comment #1 from zerotype at yahoo dot com ---
This particular use case also challenges the assertion in the GCC documentation
that "It does not make sense for a noreturn function to have a return type
other than void.". Some of the function po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67768
Bug ID: 67768
Summary: Second and subsequent captured variable in variadic
template unpaking are default constructed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67718
--- Comment #2 from Than McIntosh ---
>>using __builtin_copysignl should generate better code generation anyways.
Tried replacing the guts of the function with a call to __builtin_copysignl --
the bug is still present.
Any recommendations on s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
We diffed the output of -fdump-tree-graphite-all for interchange-1.c and the
problem seems to be related to the ISL scheduler: I would highly recommend that
people stop using outdated ISL versions.
with ISL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #2)
> We diffed the output of -fdump-tree-graphite-all for interchange-1.c and the
> problem seems to be related to the ISL scheduler: I would highly recommend
> that people
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
languages=c,lto --no-create
--no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150929 (experimental) [trunk revision 143368] (GCC)
I looked into the tree dump, it seems that VRP2 pass. The second MAX_EXPR is
folded.
Folding statement: iftmp.0_3 = MIN_EXPR ;
Not folded
Folding statement: if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
The release managers will decide the requirements and when lib versions will be
deprecated.
I am still investigating a fix to continue supporting ISL-0.14: we will add
code to configure.ac to detect ISL vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Sep 29 16:37:26 2015
New Revision: 228256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-29 Vladimir Makarov
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36415|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67431
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58644
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I believe that my imminent fix for PR63205 will correct this issue
> and so eliminate this PR.
Does it? If yes, this PR should be closed as FIXED. If no, what is missing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61960
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67721
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any plan to back port the fix to 5.3? If no, the PR could be closed as FIXED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67721
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Probably phiopt not clearing the flow sensitive info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36417|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67770
Bug ID: 67770
Summary: i386: -fshrink-wrap can interact badly with
trampolines
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67764
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59672
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #10 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59672
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 07:56:16PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> troutmask:sgk[204] gfc6 -c r5.f
> f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> no stack trace because unwind library not ava
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67771
Bug ID: 67771
Summary: integer-to-floating-point conversions wrongly produce
-0 in FE_DOWNWARD mode
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #19)
I have no objection. I thought that the fix for PR67723 on trunk is first,
though either way will be fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Sep 29 22:15:08 2015
New Revision: 228268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
use MIN fusion for ISL-14
This patch fixes PR66754 by reverting an earlier
"GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20150929 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 interrupt-7]$
Both fn1 and fn2 have to save and restore caller-saved registers.
If all registers in bar are callee-saved, fn1 and fn2 can be
much smaller.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Note that the failures
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/block-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/block-1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
with -m32 are still there with isl-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> As I do not see the errors in my builds, I will investigate.
> Thanks for letting me know that this testcase is still failing.
Are you testing with -m32?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67772
Bug ID: 67772
Summary: wrong type_info emitted for cv-qualified pointer to
member types
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773
Bug ID: 67773
Summary: dealloc called on temp object before and named object
after move, while not being called on named object
before move
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67774
Bug ID: 67774
Summary: [concepts] ICE when mismatching template arguments to
concept
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67775
Bug ID: 67775
Summary: [concepts] bug when using variadic expansions in
compound requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773
--- Comment #1 from Adam Wenocur ---
compiler output:
-*- mode: compilation; default-directory: "~/compiler-test/" -*-
Compilation started at Wed Sep 30 00:45:55
./compile.sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67776
Bug ID: 67776
Summary: Missing warning when using asm labels
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67718
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: unsigned wchar_t and signed wchar_t should cause
compiler errors but do not.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67143
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
