http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52265
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53620
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53620
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53620
--- Comment #4 from Rohan Garg 2012-06-10
12:08:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27596
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27596
Build log and preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53620
--- Comment #5 from Rohan Garg 2012-06-10
12:10:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Seems like my files are too large to be attached, hence you can find them
> > here
> > http://people.ubuntu.com/~rohangarg/gcc/
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53622
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
14:19:12 UTC ---
is unimplemented, there's little point trying to use it and even less
point reporting bugs against it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] sign |[4.7/4.8 Regression] sign
|ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615
--- Comment #3 from Jan Waclawek 2012-06-10 15:07:10 UTC
---
Created attachment 27597
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27597
wek1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615
Jan Waclawek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wek at host dot sk
--- Comment #4 from Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53625
Bug #: 53625
Summary: GNAT bug box einfo.adb:2741 from Indefinite_Vectors
containing access to controlled type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045
Steven Fuerst changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svfuerst at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626
Bug #: 53626
Summary: move assignment for ifstream
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Bug #: 53627
Summary: perfect forwarding for static int member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-06-10
20:29:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 27601
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27601
test case reduced from gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c
With this test case I can reproduce th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-10 21:11:41 UTC ---
This does not look like a compiler defect to me. Z::n has never been defined
but is odr-used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|move assignment for |[C++11] move assignment for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-10 21:26:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > This is exactly:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
>
> I agree. But let me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53628
Bug #: 53628
Summary: [C++11][DR 712] Compiler requires definition of static
member constants when not odr-used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
21:37:38 UTC ---
I've updated the wiki with words to that effect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53628
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure
--- Comment #1 from Daniel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53628
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-10 21:43:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I would like to add that exactly the same example is still the main example of
> the otherwise valid explanations in
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53628
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
21:48:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I would like to add that exactly the same example is still the main example of
> the otherwise valid explanations in
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
21:50:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> because that was fixed with C++11 due to
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
>
> This situation should no longer requir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621
--- Comment #3 from Lawrence Sebald 2012-06-10
22:25:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This line is related to PR 29996 and was introduced in this patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01147.html
>
> I'm not sure whether remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-06-10
22:39:36 UTC ---
Hi Jonathan,
I've checked and double-checked this, and was hoping you could offer some
insight:
I get the "Undefined symbol: vtable for std::ctype" error only when
bootstrapping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-06-10
23:24:57 UTC ---
Oleg's patch looks the right thing to do. Perhaps
if (PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE != DWARF2_DEBUG)
flag_omit_frame_pointer = 0;
might a bit straight representation indicati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623
--- Comment #3 from Adam Warner 2012-06-10
23:32:19 UTC ---
(Off topic "Note" correction)
In my previous note I suggested the instruction "movsbq dh -> rdx". There is no
such instruction! One cannot encode register ah/bh/ch/dh in an instruction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-11
05:59:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> The #c10 testcase started failing with
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170341
Right. Using DECL_NAME to compare parameter packs doesn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53620
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-11 06:27:16 UTC ---
The attached testcase crashes in determine_visibility.
4.8 is also affected.
Here is an ugly testcase:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat test.ii
templateclass H;
template >class A;
template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-11 06:47:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > because that was fixed with C++11 due to
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
> >
> > Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-11 06:47:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > because that was fixed with C++11 due to
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
> >
> > Th
37 matches
Mail list logo
