http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-06-11 06:47:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > because that was fixed with C++11 due to > > > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712 > > > > This situation should no longer require a definition for S::a or S::b. > > Unless I'm mistaken DR 712 was not fixed in time for C++11, I don't see it in > N3290 Agreed, DR 712 is a post-C11 resolution. --- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-06-11 06:48:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > because that was fixed with C++11 due to > > > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712 > > > > This situation should no longer require a definition for S::a or S::b. > > Unless I'm mistaken DR 712 was not fixed in time for C++11, I don't see it in > N3290 Agreed, DR 712 is a post-C++11 resolution.
