http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-06-10 21:26:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > This is exactly: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition > > I agree. But let me just add that the first of the examples provided there > ("return argc > 1 ? S::a : S::b;") should no longer me listed (or be > modified), > because that was fixed with C++11 due to > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712 > > This situation should no longer require a definition for S::a or S::b. I just recognize that this example *does* require a definition for S::a and S::b in C++11 mode. I open a new issue for this.
