[Bug fortran/52968] Call to type-bound procedure produces wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52968 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] New: ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 Bug #: 52969 Summary: ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Ve

[Bug c++/52967] Segmentation fault on std::vector destruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52967 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gerasimov 2012-04-13 08:26:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't know if this is not undefined code. > >v[0].a = run(); > > Is this: > double &a = v[0].a; > a = run(); > Or: > double tmp = run(); > v[0].a =

[Bug libstdc++/52938] std::string::reserve request is not maintained if object is used in other object copy ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52938 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 08:31:13 UTC --- > The user could care less if we use copy-on-write in the string > implementation. > The standard doesn't force that (21.3.6). But it does allow it. > We are violating what th

[Bug libstdc++/52950] --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace exports symbol twice.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52950 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52967] Segmentation fault on std::vector destruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52967 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gerasimov 2012-04-13 08:44:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't know if this is not undefined code. > >v[0].a = run(); > > Is this: > double &a = v[0].a; > a = run(); > Or: > double tmp = run(); > v[0].a =

[Bug middle-end/52886] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr36978.c -On (internal compiler error), n=1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52886 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:22:37 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 13 09:22:33 2012 New Revision: 186407 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186407 Log: 2012-04-13 Richard Guenther PR c/52862

[Bug c/52549] [4.8 Regression] ice in pointer_diff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52549 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:24:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 13 09:24:28 2012 New Revision: 186408 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186408 Log: 2012-04-13 Richard Guenther PR c/52549

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:26:48 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 13 09:26:45 2012 New Revision: 186409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186409 Log: 2012-04-13 Richard Guenther PR c/52862

[Bug c/52549] [4.8 Regression] ice in pointer_diff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52549 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.1, 4.8.0 Summary|[4.5/4

[Bug other/52944] [4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_object_size(..., 1) no longer returns (size_t)-1 for consecutive flexible/zero-length array members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52944 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:30:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > wouldn't it though ? there's still a top level union there surrounding all > the > members. so flattening it, i'd get thr

[Bug fortran/52970] New: OpenMP Scoping Incorrect for Arrays of Parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970 Bug #: 52970 Summary: OpenMP Scoping Incorrect for Arrays of Parameters Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-04-13 09:36:46 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012 New Revision: 186410 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186410 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52203 PR r

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/52715] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7140 with -fselective-scheduling2 -funroll-loops --param=max-average-unrolled-insns=406

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-04-13 09:36:47 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012 New Revision: 186410 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186410 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52203 PR rt

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #14 from Laurent Aflonsi 2012-04-13 09:46:24 UTC --- Thanks very much Paolo. Here it is. I'll commit the patch in the mainline if no objection. Laurent 2012-04-13 Laurent Alfonsi PR libstdc++/52604 * src/mt_allocator.cc:

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 09:48:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > PR libstdc++/52604 > * src/mt_allocator.cc: (~__freelist): Reset pointer. ^ c++98/

[Bug c++/52964] No warning on negative array size in template instantatiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:50:01 UTC --- It's at least somewhat making -fsyntax-only less useful for C++ ... I'd use -fsyntax-only to have all errors reported and thus all invalid CUs rejected ... We do report non-syntax

[Bug c++/52954] Missing bounds check warning without optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52954 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/52967] Segmentation fault on std::vector destruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52967 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #34 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:56:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #31) > > The effect of this patch on overload resolution diagnostics is problematic: > > wa2.C: In function ‘int main()’: > > wa2.C

[Bug middle-end/52939] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52939 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 09:58:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 27143 [details] > Simple testcase > > This should be a simpler testcase. What happens is that we are > attempting to devirtualize cal

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52971] New: gcc ICE with an sh64 cross-compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52971 Bug #: 52971 Summary: gcc ICE with an sh64 cross-compilation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-13 10:29:02 UTC --- Yes, please go ahead, mainline only for now (PR remains open) with Jon's fix to the ChangeLog and also, between parentheses (__freelist::~__freelist).

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-13 10:31:01 UTC --- Ah, another minor nit, remember to add 2012 to the list of Copyright Years (mind to keep the comment within 80 columns)

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 10:39:35 UTC --- (gdb) call debug_gimple_stmt (stmt) _ifc_.9_27 = !(D.11217_6 > 0.0) ? _ifc_.8_26 : _ifc_.7_20; the negate is spurious. I have a patch. if-conversion is also incredibly stupid, tr

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #35 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 10:59:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > > btw, why do we print a location info for > > t.C:5:6: note: candidates are: >f(1); > ^ > > at all? I am proposing to print just: "not

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-04-13 11:31:37 UTC --- Ready to test the patch. I've another code that produces the same ICE in stl_algo.h:3264 not easy to reproduce in a small example...

[Bug c++/52972] New: [4.6] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52972 Bug #: 52972 Summary: [4.6] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #36 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 11:34:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #34) > > > > btw, why do we print a location info for > > > > t.C:5:6: note: candidates are: > >f(1); > > ^ > > > > at

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 11:39:27 UTC --- Created attachment 27151 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27151 patch

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 11:50:33 UTC --- I think for Richard's example a nice compromise would be: t.C: In function 'int main()': t.C:5:6: error: no matching function for call to 'f(int)' f(1); ^ note: c

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 11:53:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > > > t.C:1:6: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided > > > void f(); void f(int,int); > > > ^ > > > t.C:1:17: note: void f(int, int) >

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #39 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 11:54:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > Sounds good to me. But I think GNU conventions require a location here? Well, if that is a hard requirement, I can just suppress the caret. Or we c

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #40 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 11:58:04 UTC --- I think what Jonathan proposed in comment #37 is also nice. If Jason approves, I will implement it.

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-04-13 11:59:59 UTC --- patch applied to latest trunk. success on both cases. thanks. v. p.s. optimizing the if-conversion to produce a single comparison will be appreciated as well

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #19 from Laurent Aflonsi 2012-04-13 12:00:44 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Fri Apr 13 11:58:15 2012 New Revision: 186415 Log Message: fix last entry Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #18 from Laurent Aflonsi 2012-04-13 12:00:21 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Fri Apr 13 11:44:13 2012 New Revision: 186414 Log Message: PR:52604: (~__freelist): Reset pointer Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog t

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-04-13 12:04:38 UTC --- On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 > > --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente > 2012-04-13

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #41 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 12:07:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > just not print the "note: candidates are:". It seems superfluous info to me. Personally I like the "candidates are" line, I don't find it superfluous.

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #42 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 12:08:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) > I think what Jonathan proposed in comment #37 is also nice. If Jason approves, > I will implement it. Yes, I like that, too. For reference, the follow

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #43 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 12:15:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #40) > > I think what Jonathan proposed in comment #37 is also nice. If Jason > > approves, > > I will implement it. > > Yes,

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #44 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 12:18:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) > (In reply to comment #39) > > just not print the "note: candidates are:". It seems superfluous info to me. > > Personally I like the "candidates are

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 12:22:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 13 12:22:16 2012 New Revision: 186416 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186416 Log: 2012-04-13 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #45 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 12:24:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) > Yes, I like that, too. For reference, the following: > > note: candidate 'void f()' expects 0 arguments, 1 provided > void f(); void f(int,int); >

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 12:27:11 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 13 12:27:02 2012 New Revision: 186417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186417 Log: 2012-04-13 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #46 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 12:31:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #42) > > Yes, I like that, too. For reference, the following: > > > > note: candidate 'void f()' expects 0 arguments, 1 provid

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/52973] New: visibility attribute for class is not passed to its members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973 Bug #: 52973 Summary: visibility attribute for class is not passed to its members Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52973] [4.7/4.8 Regression] visibility attribute for class is not passed to its members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|regression |c++ Known to work|

[Bug target/49069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_cstoredi4, at config/arm/arm.md:7554

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/52465] [4.7 Regression] g++ rejects valid code with in-class using declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-04-13 13:02:03 UTC --- (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 3 %d3 [236]) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 3 %d3 [236]) The REG_DEAD note is bogus and confuses the renamer. Only REG_UNUSED should be on this

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-04-13 13:03:48 UTC --- I do not have a clear case in hand with evidence of "double" compare I will have a closer look to "real life" code. btw I just noticed that your test case does not vectorize ev

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[4.7 Regression]

[Bug debug/52727] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error at dwarf2cfi.c2:685

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52727 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/52864] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Assignment to pointer component for INTENT(IN) dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52864 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/52974] New: Canonicalize include paths in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974 Bug #: 52974 Summary: Canonicalize include paths in diagnostics Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Seve

[Bug c++/52974] Canonicalize include paths in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 13:16:01 UTC --- The canonicalized version of that error is a lot more readable t.cc: In function 'void f()': t.cc:2:23: error: no matching function for call to 'sort(int)' t.cc:2:23: note: candidat

[Bug c++/52906] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in check_tag_decl (decl.c:4230) with "__attribute__ ((__deprecated__));" alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52906 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/52939] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52939 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/52734] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect optimization of uClibc sbrk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52734 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/52973] [4.7/4.8 Regression] visibility attribute for class is not passed to its members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52868 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13 13:26:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I do not have a clear case in hand with evidence of "double" compare > I will have a closer look to "real life" code. > > btw > I just noticed that yo

[Bug rtl-optimization/52975] New: Ofast produces not optimized code for vectorized "converted if"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52975 Bug #: 52975 Summary: Ofast produces not optimized code for vectorized "converted if" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52968] [OOP] Call to type-bound procedure produces wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52968 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug tree-optimization/52969] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1035 with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52969 --- Comment #13 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-04-13 13:35:19 UTC --- Richard, please, look at PR59275. I think your testcase CAN produce not optimized code.

[Bug libstdc++/52938] std::string::reserve request is not maintained if object is used in other object copy ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52938 --- Comment #14 from Abdul Tohmaz 2012-04-13 13:37:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Immediately after you call reserve it returns at least 1024. But not > necessarily from that point on for ever and ever. If you call swap() to > exchange

[Bug c++/52974] Canonicalize include paths in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-13 13:42:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > This probably isn't a good idea for user headers, as the include path they use > with -I should be preserved so they recognise it, but for GCC's own C+

[Bug c++/52974] Canonicalize include paths in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-13 13:55:27 UTC --- I don't know where they're defined but they're built in and g++ -v shows them #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: /home/redi/gcc/4.x/lib/gcc/x86_6

[Bug middle-end/52939] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52939 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug fortran/52968] [OOP] Call to type-bound procedure wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52968 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 14:02:05 UTC --- This bug is similar to PR51995, and in fact the patch from comment #2 above seems to supersede the solution given there (which could be removed as a consequence): Index: gcc/

[Bug tree-optimization/52975] Ofast produces not optimized code for vectorized "converted if"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52975 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug fortran/51082] [F03] Wrong result for a pointer to a proc-pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51082 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 14:23:25 UTC --- Note: The patch in comment #2 regtests cleanly.

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-13 14:45:29 UTC --- Remember to always send the patches you commit to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org (and libstd...@gcc.gnu.org in CC), even if already approved on the fly in audit trail (which should not happe

[Bug tree-optimization/52976] New: [4.8 Regression] Revision 186384 breaks the polyhedron tests aermod.f90 and doduc.f90 at -O3 -ffast-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52976 Bug #: 52976 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Revision 186384 breaks the polyhedron tests aermod.f90 and doduc.f90 at -O3 -ffast-math Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug debug/51570] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr45003-[23].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-04-13 15:56:00 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Apr 13 15:55:52 2012 New Revision: 186420 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186420 Log: PR debug/51570 * var-tracking.c (expand_depth):

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-04-13 15:56:29 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Apr 13 15:56:21 2012 New Revision: 186422 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186422 Log: PR debug/48866 * df.h (enum debug_temp_where):

[Bug c/52977] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with `-x c-header' or `-x cxx-header' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977 Bug #: 52977 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with `-x c-header' or `-x cxx-header' option Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/52951] internal compiler error with c++11 initializer lists and C arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52951 --- Comment #2 from D W 2012-04-13 16:22:28 UTC --- I built gcc from gcc-4_7-branch, svn186417. I can confirm it does not segfault on my example.

[Bug c++/52972] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52972 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-13 16:24:07 UTC --- I think you are getting the correct behavior as the vtable for the base class is the current vtable for this. And "return static_cast < Real* > (this);" Does not change the v

[Bug c++/52972] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52972 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52972] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52972 --- Comment #3 from drinob at gmail dot com 2012-04-13 16:28:36 UTC --- Yes, this is my mistake.

[Bug c++/52978] New: Inherit from Template with specified type and override virtual function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52978 Bug #: 52978 Summary: Inherit from Template with specified type and override virtual function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c/52979] New: likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120413 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/52972] Pure virtual method is called instead of child's method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52972 --- Comment #4 from drinob at gmail dot com 2012-04-13 16:35:35 UTC --- But it seems to work in g++ 4.3 (which is used at ideone.com): http://ideone.com/zy5R4 Is that behavior uncorrect?

[Bug target/52932] AVX2 intrinsic _mm256_permutevar8x32_ps has wrong parameter type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52932 --- Comment #10 from Agner Fog 2012-04-13 16:50:33 UTC --- _mm256_permutevar8x32_epi32 has the operands in wrong order. They need to be swapped. Did you fix this too? On 12-04-2012 20:37, uros at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug target/52932] AVX2 intrinsic _mm256_permutevar8x32_ps has wrong parameter type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52932 --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-13 16:57:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > _mm256_permutevar8x32_epi32 has the operands in wrong order. They need > to be swapped. Did you fix this too? Yes.

  1   2   >