http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
--- Comment #43 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13 12:15:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #40) > > I think what Jonathan proposed in comment #37 is also nice. If Jason > > approves, > > I will implement it. > > Yes, I like that, too. For reference, the following: > > note: candidate 'void f()' expects 0 arguments, 1 provided > void f(); void f(int,int); > ^ > note: candidate 'void f(int, int)' expects 2 arguments, 1 provided > void f(); void f(int,int); > ^ To avoid confusion, that was not what Jonathan proposed in comment #37. > I'll approve a patch that implements this. With all due respect, since this is a C++ FE issue, I'll still wait for Jason's opinion before implementing anything. I still appreciate yours (or anyone else) comments. Thanks.
