http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work| |4.3.6 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13 13:10:04 UTC --- That looks good apart from the use of valid_gimple_rhs_p which allows too much. I'd rather use get_gimple_rhs_class (TREE_CODE (simplified)) and allow GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS, GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS and GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS here.