[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5/4.6 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #46 from Jan Hubicka 2

[Bug middle-end/46554] New: Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46554 Summary: Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unass

[Bug middle-end/46555] New: PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555 Summary: PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: u

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 08:46:46 UTC --- Actually, reading that comment again it, the conversion warnings are probably emitted during convert_for_assignment and thus the earlier c_fully_fold is needed. Perhaps we need anothe

[Bug c++/46526] [4.6 Regression] VTable Problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/46556] New: Code size regression in struct access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556 Summary: Code size regression in struct access Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: u

[Bug c++/46526] [4.6 Regression] VTable Problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46523] [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 09:47:19 UTC --- Created attachment 22453 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22453 reduced testcase autoreduced testcase.

[Bug c++/46526] [4.6 Regression] VTable Problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 09:55:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22454 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22454 gcc46-pr46526.patch Possible fix. Not sure how often C++ FE tries to modify something within expres

[Bug c++/46526] [4.6 Regression] VTable Problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/46535] [4.6 Regression] Endless loop during inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 10:17:03 UTC --- Created attachment 22455 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22455 reduced testcase Reduced with Index: gcc/ipa-inline.c ==

[Bug tree-optimization/46535] [4.6 Regression] Endless loop during inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 10:18:02 UTC --- It looks like we are inlining a recursive virtual call and get confused in that process.

[Bug tree-optimization/46557] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls, at cgraph.c:2820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46557 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls , at cgraph.c:2820 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/46557] [4.6 Regression] ICE in cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls, at cgraph.c:2820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46557 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug lto/45789] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'lang_type' is not supported in gimple streams with -flto when using __builtin_printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45789 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46552] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46552 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46554] Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46554 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46555] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [Bug middle-end/46554] Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression

> I thought partial inlining would maybe fix this? Otherwise it's really a > case that needs IP analysis. Not with -Os, we really know that it will optimize away. Honza

[Bug middle-end/46554] Less inlining leads to CSiBE regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46554 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-19 10:57:57 UTC --- > I thought partial inlining would maybe fix this? Otherwise it's really a > case that needs IP analysis. Not with -Os, we really know that it will optimize away. Honza

[Bug libstdc++/46544] std::map::at() defined even if __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ is not

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Mach 2010-11-19 11:13:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for clarifiying. > As you can clearly see It wasn't that clear to me. As a user of g++ and C++, and as a programmer, I am not into every DR, as I am

[Bug libstdc++/46544] std::map::at() defined even if __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ is not

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-19 11:20:17 UTC --- I understand ;) As a general rule, if you see in the code mentioned a "DR XXX. YYY", with _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS before, it means we are implementing a change beyond the letter o

[Bug lto/45789] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'lang_type' is not supported in gimple streams with -flto when using __builtin_printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45789 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 11:57:26 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 19 11:57:21 2010 New Revision: 166936 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166936 Log: 2010-11-19 Richard Guenther PR lto/457

[Bug lto/45789] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'lang_type' is not supported in gimple streams with -flto when using __builtin_printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45789 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/46558] New: dbgcnt.c messages not marked for translation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558 Summary: dbgcnt.c messages not marked for translation Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unass

[Bug middle-end/46559] New: libstdc++ link FAILs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46559 Summary: libstdc++ link FAILs with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end A

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-19 13:01:35 UTC --- My inclination is that the problem is a missing check of in_late_binary_op. Specifically, that c_common_truthvalue_conversion should call save_expr instead of c_save

[Bug tree-optimization/46560] New: libstdc++ execute FAILs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46560 Summary: libstdc++ execute FAILs with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto, wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/46561] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46561 Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug libstdc++/46544] std::map::at() defined even if __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ is not

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Mach 2010-11-19 13:12:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > As a general rule, if you see in the code mentioned a "DR XXX. > YYY", with _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS before, it means we are implementing a > change bey

[Bug debug/46558] dbgcnt.c messages not marked for translation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 13:16:04 UTC --- Hm. debug counters are for debugging only thus I don't think we need to translate strings there (much as we don't translate comments in GCC code or stuff we dump with -ftime-report

[Bug tree-optimization/46561] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46561 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-19 13:18:21 UTC --- It is caused by revision 46547: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00761.html

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-19 13:18:55 UTC --- It is caused by revision 145254: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00761.html

[Bug debug/46558] dbgcnt.c messages not marked for translation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-19 13:22:23 UTC --- On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Hm. debug counters are for debugging only thus I don't think we need to > translate strings there (much as we

[Bug testsuite/43925] Plugin tests unresolved on IRIX 6.5: libintl.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips-sgi-irix6.5|mips-sgi-irix6.5, |

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-19 13:48:45 UTC --- I can confirm that removing the gcc_assert (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)) as suggested in comment 8 does eliminate the bootstrap failures without regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10... http

[Bug tree-optimization/46561] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46561 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/46557] [4.6 Regression] ICE in cgraph_will_be_removed_from_program_if_no_direct_calls, at cgraph.c:2820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46557 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 Summary: CCP currently needs iteration for &a[i] Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/46549] MinGW bootstrap failure regarding texi GFPL license

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46549 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail dot

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-19 15:57:32 UTC --- SCCVN also fails to recognize &a[i_1] as constant. I'll add a get_addr_base_and_unit_offset variant with a callback to valueize SSA names. That should cover both.

[Bug driver/46563] New: link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 Summary: link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #1 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2010-11-19 16:05:16 UTC --- Created attachment 22458 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22458 shared lib C++ source

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Haley 2010-11-19 16:09:00 UTC --- If you try linking with "-lgcc_s -lgcc", does everything then work?

[Bug c++/46564] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3562 on invalid recursive initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46564 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3562 on invalid recursive initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #3 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2010-11-19 16:12:11 UTC --- Yes. I did find this workaround myself, but I was very surprised I had to do it manually. (As I said, the problem arised when building QT, and I guess I'm not the first

[Bug tree-optimization/45830] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Code+rodata increase with -ftree-switch-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45830 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/46565] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in pop_tinst_level (pt.c:7513) with -gstabs -g on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46565 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in pop_tinst_level (pt.c:7513) with -gstabs -g on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/46565] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in pop_tinst_level (pt.c:7513) with -gstabs -g on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46565 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Known to work|

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #4

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #5 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2010-11-19 16:49:05 UTC --- I am not sure what you mean about "libgcc_s.so linker script". But I think the difference is that I am cross-compiling.

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Haley 2010-11-19 17:30:35 UTC --- I am cross-compiling too. Try this: $ cat /home/aph/x-arm/install/arm-linux-gnueabi/lib/libgcc_s.so /* GNU ld script Use the shared library, but some functions are only in the

[Bug driver/46563] link with -lgcc when creating a shared lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46563 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-11-19 17:38:35 UTC --- The example works for me also with a cross built from gcc-4.5.1 with --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++. > armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-g++ atomic.cxx -fPIC -shared -o lib

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-19 17:42:12 UTC --- Another test case to think about. Ifort compiles but gives: ptr = myA%i%j = 1 2 3 4 gfortran compiles and gives: $ ./a.out Segm

[Bug c++/46270] [trans-mem] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46270 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/46026] [trans-mem] Unable to build libitm on Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-11-19 18:06:01 UTC --- BTW, a workaround while Alex gets his patch committed is to run make again on the partially built tree. The second time around, the build will succeed.

[Bug other/46567] New: ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 Summary: ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unass

[Bug other/46567] ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-11-19 18:11:23 UTC --- Created attachment 22460 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22460 boom

[Bug other/46567] ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||trans-mem Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/46566] New: ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46566 Summary: ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug other/46567] ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-11-19 18:14:07 UTC --- *** Bug 46566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46547] [4.5/4.6 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #10 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-11-19 18:33:02 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Fri Nov 19 18:32:57 2010 New Revision: 166951 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166951 Log: PR c/46547 * c-tree.h (in_late_binary_op

[Bug target/46436] m68hc11-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46436 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-19 18:40:31 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 19 18:40:24 2010 New Revision: 166952 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166952 Log: PR target/46436 * config/m68hc11

[Bug target/46434] crx-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46434 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-19 19:22:31 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 19 19:22:27 2010 New Revision: 166954 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166954 Log: PR target/46434 * config/crx/crx

[Bug target/46436] m68hc11-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46436 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46564] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3562 on invalid recursive initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46564 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug c++/46565] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in pop_tinst_level (pt.c:7513) with -gstabs -g on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46565 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46561] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46561 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug debug/46561] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46561 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 20:19:44 UTC --- Created attachment 22461 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22461 gcc46-pr46561.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/46568] New: special symbol "a caret" shows up for errors and warnings when running g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46568 Summary: special symbol "a caret" shows up for errors and warnings when running g++ Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/46547] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #11 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-11-19 20:45:07 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Fri Nov 19 20:45:00 2010 New Revision: 166957 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166957 Log: PR c/46547 * c-common.c (in_late_binary_

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #20 from david.sagan at gmail dot com 2010-11-19 20:46:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Is there something invalid here? > ptr = myA%i%j Yes this is not correct. This line should be: ptr => myA%i%j If you use "gfortran -fch

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/46547] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/46077] [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077 --- Comment #6 from Michael Matz 2010-11-19 20:56:33 UTC --- Author: matz Date: Fri Nov 19 20:56:27 2010 New Revision: 166958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166958 Log: PR tree-optimization/46077 * tree-chrec.c (eq

[Bug c/46547] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-19 21:01:04 UTC --- Revision 166951 breaks bootstrap with obj-c++ enabled: ld: duplicate symbol _in_late_binary_op in c-family/c-common.o and objcp/objcp-act.o

[Bug tree-optimization/46077] [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-19 21:04:22 UTC --- > > Is there something invalid here? > > Yes. You need to allocate ptr unless you have > pault's [re-]allocate on assignment patch. Even with Paul's patch it does not work.

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #23 from david.sagan at gmail dot com 2010-11-19 21:24:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > > > Is there something invalid here? > > > > Yes. You need to allocate ptr unless you have > > pault's [re-]allocate on assignment patch. >

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #24 from Steve Kargl 2010-11-19 21:32:38 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:04:42PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 > > --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres > 2010-11

[Bug c++/46568] special symbol "a caret" shows up for errors and warnings when running g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46564] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3562 on invalid recursive initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46564 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46339] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-19 21:46:56 UTC --- > Well, in theory, I believe it should work with Paul's patch. > Of course, theory and experience are two different beast. :) When Paul will have commit his final patch, it wi

[Bug rtl-optimization/46571] New: bootsrap comparison failure in fortran/trans-openmp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46571 Summary: bootsrap comparison failure in fortran/trans-openmp.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/46571] bootsrap comparison failure in fortran/trans-openmp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46571 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46571] bootsrap comparison failure in fortran/trans-openmp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46571 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ia64-linux Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/46572] New: forward_list nodes are not packed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572 Summary: forward_list nodes are not packed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gc

[Bug libstdc++/46572] forward_list nodes are not packed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-19 22:25:32 UTC --- >zero space or time overhead We have a zero time overhead here. packed would increase the time overhead here really.

[Bug libstdc++/46572] forward_list nodes are not packed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572 --- Comment #2 from Kyle Kloepper 2010-11-19 22:47:47 UTC --- Created attachment 22464 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22464 Program to print out the size used by forward_list node allocation

[Bug libstdc++/46572] forward_list nodes are not packed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572 --- Comment #3 from Kyle Kloepper 2010-11-19 23:01:07 UTC --- I would read the standard as in inclusive or. But even if you read it as one or the other, I do not think that in all cases speed would be prefered over space. Is there any way to im

[Bug rtl-optimization/46571] [4.6 Regression] bootsrap comparison failure in fortran/trans-openmp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46571 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P2

[Bug c/46547] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 23:44:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 19 23:44:47 2010 New Revision: 166964 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166964 Log: PR c/46547 * objc-act.c (in_late_binary_op

[Bug c/46547] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when converting a complex to a bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46547 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 23:47:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 19 23:46:57 2010 New Revision: 166965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166965 Log: PR c/46547 * objc-act.c (in_late_binary_op

  1   2   >