[Bug bootstrap/18467] crosscompiler doesn't build with newlib

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-11-14 08:42 --- (In reply to comment #2) > For linux you have to use glibc as that is only one supported for unwinding. (...) + cd obj-arm-pld-linux + ../configure \ --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/

[Bug c/18473] New: unrecognizable insn compiling various sources

(This is filed as PR toolchain/28065 in the NetBSD gnats database) When crosscompiling a NetBSD/hppa kernel on a NetBSD/sparc64 host, the compiler fails in various files. On example of the error message is: /usr/src/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c: In function `nd6_setmtu0': /usr/src/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.

[Bug c/18473] unrecognizable insn compiling various sources

--- Additional Comments From martin at netbsd dot org 2004-11-14 10:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7543) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7543&action=view) nd6.i - preproccessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18473

Re: {Virus?} trust me

[Bug c++/18474] New: Unary plus/minus lvalueness not diagnosed in templates

- template void g(void) { -n = 0;// { dg-error "non-lvalue" "" { xfail *-*-* } } +n = 0;// { dg-error "non-lvalue" "" { xfail *-*-* } } } - This should be rejected but does not (until instantiation). --

[Bug c++/17344] completely wacky error with matching template template classes and default arguments

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 10:57 --- Subject: Bug 17344 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 10:57:00 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c gcc/testsuite

[Bug c++/17344] completely wacky error with matching template template classes and default arguments

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 10:59 --- Fixed in the mainline by patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01152.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18471] [4.0 regression] ICE on invalid template class

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 11:07 --- Got it. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lerdsuwa at

[Bug tree-optimization/18475] New: [4.0 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in tree_verify_flow_info with -funswitch-loops

- /* { dg-options "-O1 -funswitch-loops" } */ extern int bar (void); void foo (int c, int b) { retry: switch (c) { case 1: return; case 2: if (b) c = bar (); if (c != 3)

[Bug fortran/18476] New: internal compiler error on strange read

nu/4.0.0/specs Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --enable-languages=c,c++,f95 : (reconfigured) ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/ig25/gcc/gcc/version.c --enable-languages=c,c++,f95 --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version

[Bug middle-end/18477] New: Wsequence-point false positive

int main() { char* data; *data++ = *data+1; } $ g++ -Wall tt.cpp tt.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: tt.cpp:7: warning: operation on ‘data’ may be undefined afaik "=" is a sequence point, so there shouldn't be any undefined behaviour here. -- Summary: Wsequence-p

[Bug middle-end/18477] Wsequence-point false positive

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18477

[Bug c++/18471] [4.0 regression] ICE on invalid template class

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 11:28 --- My friend class lookup part 1 patch fixes this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01321.html This was approved together with part 2 with some formatting changes: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat

[Bug bootstrap/18058] [4.0 Regression] Sun CC cannot bootstrap GCC (static inline)

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 11:45 --- Rainer, would you mind submitting your patch on the gcc-patches list? TIA. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058

[Bug rtl-optimization/16503] ICE during make -C gcc gnatlib

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 11:57 --- I've built a sparc-sun-solaris2.8 x sparc64-sun-solaris2.8 Ada cross-compiler with GCC 3.4.3 so closing as presumably fixed. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/16986] ICE during make -C gcc gnatlib

-- Bug 16986 depends on bug 16503, which changed state. Bug 16503 Summary: ICE during make -C gcc gnatlib http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16503 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug target/18444] [4.0 Regression] Multithreading broken on Unix95-class platforms

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 13:13 --- Fixing. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou

[Bug target/18421] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-14 13:53 --- // small testcase, use -O1 -m5200: extern char n; void foo (char *s) { n += *s + 9; } -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18475] [4.0 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in tree_verify_flow_info with -funswitch-loops

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 14:37 --- Confirmed. Seems to be recent, since Phil's regression hunter doesn't trigger. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] New: ICE with -funroll-loops

Consider: void bar (int); void foo (void) { unsigned arg; unsigned i; for (i = 1; i < 10; i++) { switch (i) { case 2: case 9: arg = 1; break; default: arg = 0; break; } bar (arg); } } "./c

[Bug tree-optimization/18475] [4.0 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in tree_verify_flow_info with -funswitch-loops

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-14 15:14 --- *** Bug 18478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-14 15:14 --- heh, i am first :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18475 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-14 15:19 --- gah pardon, my fault. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|U

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 15:33 --- This is also a recent regression, like PR18475. Jeff, I suspect that your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-11/msg00596.html is responsible for the regression(s), but I haven't checked that yet. -

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-11-14 15:47 --- I am doing a binary search right now, but it's probably Jeff's patch that causes this bug. With his patch, GCC shares some CASE_LABEL_EXPR within one SWITCH_EXPR. When a basic block is copied, I don't think t

[Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

--- Additional Comments From ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2004-11-14 17:03 --- Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions Thanks, Paul. Let me know if I can help in any way. I appeneded the output of "gcc -v". -Ken ==

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:06 --- Even though they might not be dups, they are related bugs. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/18477] Wsequence-point false positive

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:09 --- '=' is never a seqeunce point. The code you gave is equivalent to: *(data++) = (*data)+1; data could be incemented before or after. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18473] unrecognizable insn compiling various sources

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug tree-optimization/18472] TREE_OPERAND (t, 1) is referenced for t being GOTO_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:12 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/18474] Unary plus/minus lvalueness not diagnosed in templates

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:18 --- Confirmed. Note the testcase is not full you have to have a declaration for n. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18476] internal compiler error on strange read

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:21 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/18475] [4.0 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in tree_verify_flow_info with -funswitch-loops

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-11-14 17:26 --- See PR 18478 for patch. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/18475] [4.0 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault in tree_verify_flow_info with -funswitch-loops

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-11-14 17:30 --- The underlying problem is the same as that of PR 18478. Basically, SWITCH_EXPR is incorrectly duplicated when a basic block is duplicated. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18478 *** --

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-11-14 17:30 --- *** Bug 18475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added Bug 18478

[Bug c++/18479] New: __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) in C causes internal compiler error

Using GCC v4.0_20041107 on FreeBSD v5.3: struct __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) Foo { int foo; }; int main(void) { Foo foo; return 0; } If compiled as a C++ file, all is fine. If compiled as C you get: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'declaration', have 'exceptional'

[Bug c/18479] __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) in C causes internal compiler error

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |c http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18479

[Bug c/18479] [4.0 Regression] __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) in C causes internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 17:40 --- : Search converges between 2004-07-21-trunk (#492) and 2004-07-23-trunk (#493). Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18478] [4.0 Regression] ICE with -funroll-loops

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-14 17:49 --- Well, if unshare_expr is invalid for SWITCH_EXPRs, I guess you should either do your check within unshare_expr itself, or at least add a gcc_assert() to unshare_expr so that we check that it is never called

[Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 18:04 --- Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions Ken, Did you miss the question? Paul >>(iii) gcc 4.0.0 20041010 (experimental) I get 0.62 and 0.59micro-sec/new >> >>This

[Bug tree-optimization/18431] Code for arrays and pointers are not the same

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:04 --- Subject: Bug 18431 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 18:04:26 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-flow.h tree-ssa-loop-i

[Bug middle-end/18480] New: [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

foo (a, b, c, d, e, i0, f, i1) double a, b, c, d, e, f; int i0, i1; {} main () { foo (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 1, 6.0, 2); } Caused by: 2004-11-13 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * calls.c (precompute_register_parameters): Force all PARALLELs into pseudo regis

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18480

[Bug tree-optimization/18425] ICE in vector.tcc when -ftree-vectorize enabled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:25 --- Subject: Bug 18425 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 18:25:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-vectorizer.c Log mes

[Bug tree-optimization/18400] wrong unrolling after vectorization due to invalid loop->nb_iterations

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:30 --- Subject: Bug 18400 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 18:30:36 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-vectorizer.c Log mes

[Bug tree-optimization/18425] ICE in vector.tcc when -ftree-vectorize enabled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:31 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/18400] wrong unrolling after vectorization due to invalid loop->nb_iterations

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:33 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/18324] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010518-2.c execution, -O0

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:43 --- Known to work with: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" (Known to fail with: "Sat Nov 13 21:48:30 UTC 2004") -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18328] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: execute/20040629-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:43 --- Known to work with: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" (Known to fail with: "Sat Nov 13 21:48:30 UTC 2004") -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/17279] [3.4/4.0 Regression] internal compiler error with 128 bit integers

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 18:54 --- Subject: Bug 17279 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 18:54:19 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-common.c Log message:

[Bug objc/18406] [3.4 Regression] ICE compiling Objective C code with long double arguments

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 18406 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 19:01:03 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug objc/18406] [3.4 Regression] ICE compiling Objective C code with long double arguments

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 19:02 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/17279] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error with 128 bit integers

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 19:03 --- Fixed on the mainline but a number of things have to be backported to the 3.4 branch to get this fixed. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18459] [4.0 Regression] gcj no longer works on win32

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-14 19:34 --- Small followup: Even though the hello world app works, a much larger app does not work (error: app.exe is not a valid Win32 application.) unless I 'strip' it. I'm not sure why that would be... (If

[Bug target/18459] [4.0 Regression] gcj no longer works on win32

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 19:38 --- "error: app.exe is not a valid Win32 application" sounds like a binutils problem, I would report it to them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18459

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

-- What|Removed |Added CC|rth at redhat dot com | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 19:49 --- Try that. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http:

[Bug target/18473] unrecognizable insn compiling various sources

--- Additional Comments From martin at netbsd dot org 2004-11-14 19:56 --- Forgot to mention (and did not try myself): I've been told this same stuff compiles just fine for NetBSD/hppa on a i386 host. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18473

[Bug target/18459] [4.0 Regression] gcj no longer works on win32

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-14 20:25 --- I use binutils-2.15.91-20040904-1 from mingw.org (latest I think). I thought by removing the change to cygming.h this weak sym problem would be gone, but I guess there are other changes somewhere th

[Bug fortran/18481] New: ICE with integer variable "format"

/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/ig25/gcc/gcc/version.c --enable-languages=c,c++,f95 --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.0 20041114 (experimental) $ cat format-int.f90 program internal integer k character(len=80) chr read(chr,k) end program

[Bug target/18482] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t003 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t020 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link FA

[Bug tree-optimization/18400] wrong unrolling after vectorization due to invalid loop->nb_iterations

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 20:45 --- Subject: Bug 18400 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 20:44:52 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug tree-optimization/18425] ICE in vector.tcc when -ftree-vectorize enabled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 20:45 --- Subject: Bug 18425 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 20:44:52 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug target/18350] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-convert-1.c (1-3 actually) gcc.dg/torture/builtin-power-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 20:57 --- I'm logging these failures here too, seemingly never having succeeded and failing (as do the builtin-convert tests) with "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004". FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-power-1.c -O0 (test for exc

[Bug target/18483] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test With the message in gcc.log being: sizeof short failed __alignof__ short failed sizeof signed short failed __alignof__ signed short failed sizeof unsigned short failed __alignof__ unsigned short fa

[Bug target/18484] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6) With the message in g++.log being: (none, as there are no warnings or errors) Not known to ever having worked for this target and fails with unspecified checkouts of 3.3 and 3.4. At a

[Bug target/18349] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/visibility-1.c (actually all) g++.dg/ext/visibility/*

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 21:20 --- I'm logging these failures here as well; apparently the same bug, seen with "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004": FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/assign1.C (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/assign1.C sca

[Bug target/18485] New: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C (test for excess errors) With the message in g++.log being: /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C: In function 'void Go()': /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C:25: error: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK is missi

[Bug bootstrap/18486] New: fixincl fails with make -j

make profiledbootstrap -jN with high N breaks while fixincl. The compilation works ok without -j One error is always: mv: cannot stat `tmp-macro_list': No such file or directory with a bunch of follow-ons. -- Summary: fixincl fails with make -j Product: gcc Ve

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] New: Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

It would be nice if GCC can issue warnings for pure or const functions that are not actually pure or const. int foo (int) __attribute__ ((pure)); int bar (int) __attribute__ ((const)); int g; int foo (int a) { g = a; /* A pure function is not supposed to write to memory. */ return 0; } int

[Bug tree-optimization/18487] Warnings for pure and const functions that are not actually pure or const

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 21:57 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:02 --- That fixes those regressions but there was another one (before) which I did not report in this one: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /Users/pinskia/src/l

[Bug target/18488] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/opt/vt1.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.dg/opt/vt1.C scan-assembler-not section[^\n\r]*_ZTV1S[^\n\r]*"[^w"\n\r]*" With the message in the .log being: /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/vt1.C:1: warning: -fpic not supported: ignored The test is not known to ever having succeeded.

[Bug rtl-optimization/18485] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Component|target

[Bug target/18488] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/opt/vt1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:07 --- Confirmed, your assumention about not running this test is correct. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18486] [4.0 Regression] fixincl fails with make -jN profilebootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:09 --- Hmm, I do a normal bootstrap all the time, so this must be a profiledbootstrap problem. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18483] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:14 --- This and PR 18338 are one in the same in that they are the same tests run over the C and C++ front- ends. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18338 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug target/18338] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/bitfld-4.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:14 --- *** Bug 18483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18338

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:14 --- Try again. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http

[Bug target/18338] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/bitfld-4.c and g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:15 --- g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C is the same test except with the C++ front-end compiling it. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18489] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "" I get: FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE: No particular info in the g++.log. The test is absent on an unspecified 3.3 checkout and is xfailing on an unspecified 3.4 checkout. It's unknown to, and unlikely to ever have succeeded. The test assumes

[Bug target/18489] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:18 --- The reason why this is xfailed on the 3.4 branch is because it was broken there when it was added on almost all targets. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18489] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:22 --- s/""/"Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004"/ in original entry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18489

[Bug fortran/18481] ICE with integer variable "format"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:25 --- Confirmed. Looks like NIST f77 has the same ICE (from PR 17423): FM020.f:177: internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify_expr, at fortran/trans.c:154 FM311.f:401: internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify_

[Bug target/18490] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.law/bit-fields2.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/bit-fields2.C With the message in the .log being: FAIL As is evident in the test file, this test was skipped for mmix-knuth-mmixware in the old testsuite framework, but "skip-if" in this test (and all tests?) wasn

[Bug target/18490] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.law/bit-fields2.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:33 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/18480] [4.0 Regression] ICE in emit_group_move with recent change

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:35 --- Yes that fixes all the problems. Thanks. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

--- Additional Comments From ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2004-11-14 22:40 --- Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions > Did you miss the question? Umm, apparently I did.. the only thing I see in the bug log that looks like a question is this:

[Bug target/18491] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable (no FAIL/PASS/XFAIL/XPASS though) With the message in the .log being: /gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C: In member function 'void A::main()': /gcc

[Bug target/18491] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:53 --- By "failing" I mean "has the warning". Apparently it's not logged as a failure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18491

[Bug c++/18491] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:56 --- It also fails on ppc-darwin: : WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable And x86_64-linux-gnu:

[Bug rtl-optimization/18485] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C g++.old-deja/g++.niklas/t132.C g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:58 --- g++.old-deja/g++.niklas/t132.C and g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C of the same test-run seem to be the same bug judging by the g++.log contents. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/18492] New: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 14 05:49:38 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C compilation failed to produce executable With the message in the .log being: /gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C: In member fu

[Bug c++/18492] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 23:12 --- Confirmed. This is exception handling related. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNC

[Bug rtl-optimization/18485] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/lookup/forscope1.C g++.old-deja/g++.niklas/t132.C g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 23:12 --- Confirmed. This is exception handling related. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNC

[Bug c++/18492] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 23:12 --- Woops that comment was for PR 18485. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|EH

[Bug c++/18492] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 23:14 --- Confirmed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18492

[Bug other/7257] [3.4/4.0 regression] -O3 -fverbose-asm does not display -flag-inline-functions

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-15 00:14 --- Posted a first patch that fixes the symptom: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01188.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7257

[Bug tree-optimization/18431] Code for arrays and pointers are not the same

-niter.c tree.c tree.h gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20041114-1.c Log message: PR tree-optimization/18431 * fold-const.c (associate_trees): Do not produce x + 0

  1   2   >