------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 18:04 ------- Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions
Ken, Did you miss the question? Paul >>(iii) gcc 4.0.0 20041010 (experimental) I get 0.62 and 0.59micro-sec/new >> >>This latter was a tad unexpected - I built in from a snapshot on one of the >>German mirror sites. Does this imply that I have picked up Dwarf2 as a >>default? >> >> > > > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563
