------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-14 
22:02 -------
That fixes those regressions but there was another one (before) which I did not 
report in this one:

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c  -O0  (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c:4: 
error: 
unrecognizable insn:
(insn 32 25 33 1 (set (reg:DF 143)
        (parallel:DF [
                (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:SI 141)
                    (const_int 0 [0x0]))
                (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 142)
                    (const_int 0 [0x0]))
            ])) -1 (nil)
    (nil))
Reduced testcase (well really a modified version of 960829-1.c to get rid of a 
warning):

void g(int, ...);
void f ()
{
  g (0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
}

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2004-11-14 19:47:47         |2004-11-14 22:02:16
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18480

Reply via email to