------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14 22:02 ------- That fixes those regressions but there was another one (before) which I did not report in this one:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c:4: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 32 25 33 1 (set (reg:DF 143) (parallel:DF [ (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:SI 141) (const_int 0 [0x0])) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 142) (const_int 0 [0x0])) ])) -1 (nil) (nil)) Reduced testcase (well really a modified version of 960829-1.c to get rid of a warning): void g(int, ...); void f () { g (0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0); } -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2004-11-14 19:47:47 |2004-11-14 22:02:16 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18480