------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-14
22:02 -------
That fixes those regressions but there was another one (before) which I did not
report in this one:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/960829-1.c:4:
error:
unrecognizable insn:
(insn 32 25 33 1 (set (reg:DF 143)
(parallel:DF [
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:SI 141)
(const_int 0 [0x0]))
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 142)
(const_int 0 [0x0]))
])) -1 (nil)
(nil))
Reduced testcase (well really a modified version of 960829-1.c to get rid of a
warning):
void g(int, ...);
void f ()
{
g (0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-14 19:47:47 |2004-11-14 22:02:16
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18480